Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Ludo Kressh's pedicure set

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Ludo Kressh's pedicure set

• Nominated by: Calithlin (comlink) 18:30, February 17, 2010 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Hilarious amount of information for a malevolent nail trimmer.

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

1. You're amazing, Cylka. I very much missed your talents and your determination. Graestan^(Talk)
2. Very nice. Jonjedigrandmaster ^{(We seed the stars)} 00:50, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
3. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:31, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
4. Good work, but it's a pity that it had to be adopted. Nayayen—TALK 14:26, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
5. Great job, Cylka. Guess Sith Lords have to keep their appearances up, too…--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 20:50, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
6. Grunny (talk) 23:21, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

Object

1. Preliminaries
   • Expand the intro. One that only consists of one sentence is not adequate.
     • Expanded the intro. Not sure if it should be longer/more detailed without ruining the rest of the article.Calithlin (comlink)
   • Full sourcing is required in the infobox and body if there's more than one appearance.
     • Added sourcing Calithlin (comlink)
   • Speculation does not belong in any article on Wookieepedia.
     • Removed/edited what I think you thought was speculation. Calithlin (comlink)
   • Nothing to specifically describe the set? Not even in a "Description" section?
     • Described what could be described in new description section. Calithlin (comlink)
   • Please make sure that you are absolutely confident that the article adheres to every single one of the GAN Rules listed at the top of this page, which should ideally be done before nominating an article. CC7567 ^(talk) 05:20, February 18, 2010 (UTC)
     • Done. Cylka^-talk- 13:25, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
2. Driveby!
   • Source the {{Fact}} tag. Xd 20:13, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
     • The one about what was inside of it? I figured it was all I could do to make the description section more than one sentance long, since it is never shown what is inside. I'll move that to behind the scenes.
3. Nayayen
   • "The artifact was later discovered by agents of the Jedi Covenant and taken to the Sanctum of the Exalted for study, and later discovered by Zayne Carrick and his partner, Marn "Gryph" Hierogryph." This sentence is too long, please break it up a bit.
     • Broke this up.
       • Perhaps add a little bit to say why/what they were investigating? Nayayen—TALK 13:22, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
         • Expanded Cylka^-talk- 13:25, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
   • "Ludo Kressh slowly executed every member of her family one-by-one." I can't find anything saying that he killed them one-by-one, just that he killed them.
     • Changed to 'Ludo Kressh executed every member of her family, starting with her father'
   • Your linking needs improvement: link once at the first mention in the infobox, intro and main body of the article.
     • Added/removed links to follow as detailed above.
   • The content for the "JAQ1" ref should be put into {{WebCite}}. You'll probably want to use the link, title, access date, author and format fields.
     • Done and done.
   • There isn't really a need to include "Gryph" in Hierogryph's name when you first mention him because you don't use the nickname anywhere.
     • Removed.
   • The Bts doesn't need to summarise the events you've already described in the history. It should contain information about what it was portrayed in.
     • Hacked out all the story elements.
   • Nothing more from me on an interesting choice of article. Nayayen—TALK 15:58, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
4. I could find nothing in the eBook source mentioning the pedicure set. And the Q&A only confirms that the pedicure set found in the KotOR comics is Ludo Kressh's actual pedicure kit. I don't think this article should include the other source. Graestan^(Talk) 01:19, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
   • I have reworked the whole article. Please look it over to see if it now satisfies your objection. Cylka^-talk- 13:25, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 23:24, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

• After two unanswered talk page messages to the nominator and consultation with other AC members, I have adopted this article's nomination. Cylka^-talk- 13:23, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

Unaddressed objection for over 3 weeks. Jonjedigrandmaster ^{(We seed the stars)} 19:34, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

1. CC7567 ^(talk) 20:14, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
   • Cylka sent a talk page message to the nominator yesterday asking her if she was still interested in maintaining the nomination. If she doesn't receive a response, I believe Cylka would like to take over the nomination. So I would say give this another day. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:32, March 19, 2010 (UTC)