Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Lance corporal

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Lance corporal
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support votes
      • 1.1.2 Objections
        • 1.1.2.1 ScoobySupreme21
        • 1.1.2.2 Lew
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Lance corporal

  • Nominated by: Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:56, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 04:10, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 595 words (32 introduction, 348 body, 215 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 623 words (33 introduction, 330 body, 260 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 19:15, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Assuming Lew's objection is sorted.—spookywillowwtalk 23:20, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 05:17, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
  4. Booply (talk) 18:26, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 00:28, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Objections

ScoobySupreme21
  • Wikipedia link under External links is needed.
    • Added! Editoronthewiki (talk) 19:06, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
  • The real-world background is interesting, but is all of that necessary to include? SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 19:01, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
    • hmmm, I'm of two minds on it. I could easily see the argument that it should be removed, but will wait to see if other editors weigh in on it if it should be removed. In any case, I do believe the difference between the Sith Eternal lance corporal and irl lance corporal rank in comparison to the corporal rank should be retained Editoronthewiki (talk) 19:06, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
      • Gotta say (since other opinions were asked for here) that it does seem a bit excessive. Only keeping the Eternal/IRL comparison and also the last sentence of what it effectively means, without the much lengthier breakdown of linguistics, would be more in line with the brief IRL description standard that is precedent.—spookywillowwtalk 12:23, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
        • Cut down. Thoughts? Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:34, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
          • That is better. I'm not sure if the translation bit is still necessary either but it works for me. SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 19:15, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Lew
  • Did speak about this withanother AC, but I think the wording at the start of the second paragraph should just be changed to 'In the real world, the title...' Lewisr (talk) 04:54, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
    • Perhaps a tad melodramatic on my part, yes, heh. Changed! Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:08, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 00:28, 29 September 2025 (UTC)