Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Kleef

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Kleef
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Graestan
        • 1.1.2.2 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Kleef

  • Nominated by: QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 20:11, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The guys from Krome really like one-eyed villains.

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:53, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Also very good work. You're underrated, man! Graestan(Talk) 14:32, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Grunny (talk) 09:05, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:17, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
  5. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 21:20, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Graestan
  • I don't believe that Starkiller's comment on Kleef's preparedness belongs; it really doesn't have any bearing on Kleef himself as the subject of the article. Graestan(Talk) 20:55, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
    • Removed.
  • Can "the traditional Gungan weapon" be sourced to TFU? i.e. Does the game state that explicitly? If not, then please add another refnote. Graestan(Talk) 21:00, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
    • Addressed. Thanks for the review. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 09:10, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Please link either Chief Administrator or administrator here, whichever is most appropriate: "the city's chief administrator" Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:30, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
    • I've actually changed this to a more accurate description of Lobot's position. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 12:49, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:20, March 20, 2011 (UTC)