- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Klaus Vandangante (+5)
Support
- Nominated. jSarek 11:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Good. -Fnlayson 02:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Looks great. --School of Thrawn 101 09:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Greyman(Paratus) 16:45, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- --Eyrezer 04:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Object
Comments
- I believe, now that I've got him sourced up all pretty, that he's ready for the GA treatment. jSarek 11:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- The image needs to be sourced and I don't like the red links (But that's just my personal opinion). I feel it's not enough for an objection because the article looks great. Good job. --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 22:31, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Regardless, all of those concerns have now been taken care of. :-) jSarek 00:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- The image needs to be sourced and I don't like the red links (But that's just my personal opinion). I feel it's not enough for an objection because the article looks great. Good job. --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 22:31, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- I had wanted to ask for more detail on his improvements to the Falcon, but there's not much details in sources (Rebel Dawn, maybe others?). Besides, that would probably look biased/slanted to single that ship out. -Fnlayson 02:28, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Not much detail has been give specifically about Doc's improvements to the Falcon, rather than Solo's improvements in general (whether made himself or with help of techs like Doc). That said . . . the lack of complete detail is the reason this is up for GA and not FA. ;-) jSarek 19:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yea, thanks for repeating the details thing back. ;) -Fnlayson 20:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Not much detail has been give specifically about Doc's improvements to the Falcon, rather than Solo's improvements in general (whether made himself or with help of techs like Doc). That said . . . the lack of complete detail is the reason this is up for GA and not FA. ;-) jSarek 19:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)