Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Kathol Protector

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Kathol Protector

• Nominated by: Cavalier One^{(Squadron channel)} 21:33, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Project DarkStryder continues unabated.

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

1. SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is the truth)} 08:43, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
2. Looks good after a copyedit. Master Jonathan^{Jedi Council Chambers} 00:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
3. Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Jujiggum) 21:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
4. I'm assuming it's here just because it's currently only a couple (literally, just two) words under 1,000. CC7567 ^(talk) 21:55, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
5. Chack Jadson ^(Talk) 13:49, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
6. Grunny ^(Talk) 14:02, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Object

1. Soresu
   • In 8 ABY, shortly after the liberation of the sector capital of Kal'Shebbol, the Kathol Protector assaulted the planet Kolatill after the population overthrew their Imperial governor and declared their allegiance to the New Republic. After is repetitive.
     • Changed one.
   • The ship required a crew of three thousand, five hundred and five—which included twenty gunners—but could be crewed by one thousand five hundred beings if the need arose. Required would imply a mininum crew number.
     • Amended.
   • And that's it. Good job. SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is the truth)} 23:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
     • Many thanks for the review. - Cavalier One^{(Squadron channel)} 08:06, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
2. In the intro: "In 8 ABY, following the liberation of the sector capital of Kal'Shebbol, the Kathol Protector assaulted the planet Kolatill after the population overthrew their Imperial governor and declared their allegiance to the New Republic." I don't think that both the "following the" and "after the" are needed. This compares the event chronologically to two different things. I belive that the later one is used as context for the liberation: could these be combined, either before or after the other information in the sentence? Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Jujiggum) 00:28, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
   • I reworked the intro a little. See what you think. - Cavalier One^{(Squadron channel)} 08:07, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Comments

• Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 14:02, 23 June 2009 (UTC)