- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.
Juno Eclipse
- Nominated by: Darth Nikolai 06:20, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: New, but maybe it cuts the mustard? Spoilers for The Force Unleashed
(0 AC/2 users/2 total)
Support
- Well put together article, reads really well, well thought out. I would give it a go. I'm amazed at how quickly it was put together as well.Easy88 13:31, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Lol, well I may be a *tad* obsessed with her. 0:-)Darth Nikolai 15:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
- Toprawa:
- Unfortunately, I'm going to have to cite Rule 5, instability, for this one. With TFU at the height of its popularity right now so close to the game's release, this article is going to be magnet for newcomers to the site, and its content is going to fluctuate constantly and greatly from day to day. Maybe wait a few months when the TFU fervor has died down. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:00, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- Incidentally, it's currently protected (I don't know why, it was like that when I rewrote it) New comers aren't going to be able to go crazy with it and the content has remained almost entirely as it was written two days after the novel was released. just not quite sure that's a viable argument. —Unsigned comment by Darth Nikolai (talk • contribs)
- Unfortunately, I'm going to have to cite Rule 5, instability, for this one. With TFU at the height of its popularity right now so close to the game's release, this article is going to be magnet for newcomers to the site, and its content is going to fluctuate constantly and greatly from day to day. Maybe wait a few months when the TFU fervor has died down. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:00, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- DC
- I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to agree with Toprawa and state Rule 5 as well. Even if the article's content hasn't changed that much so far, there's no telling how much it can be changed in the next week or so. It could be completely unrecognizable, or mostly the same. I don't doubt the quality of the article; I read it and seems like it could survive the GA process, but she's too much of a major character in the game, and TFU seems to be at the height of its popularity. Mayble in a month or so. DC 03:22, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Comments
- If you're going to nominate an article from a recently released source, please indicate that it has spoilers to warn potential readers who have not yet read the source material. - Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 07:15, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry. Darth Nikolai 15:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- No worries - we just had a similar situation with a nomination further up the page. - Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 12:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry. Darth Nikolai 15:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Removal vote (AgriCorps Vote only)
Rule 5 has absolutely killed this nom. Once TFU fervor has calmed down a bit, maybe, but for now, no. DC 03:22, 28 September 2008 (UTC)- Try again in a few months. Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:27, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- Graestan(Talk) 22:19, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
In the spirit of keeping things moving, —Tommy9281 (Peace is a lie) 22:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
