Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Imperial Oasis

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Imperial Oasis
    • 1.1 (0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Xd1358
        • 1.1.2.2 Fett
      • 1.1.3 Comments
      • 1.1.4 Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

Imperial Oasis

  • Nominated by: Lexx Yovel 14:43, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: First nomination

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Xd1358
  • A quick glance reveals that the infobox is not sourced.
  • SWG wiki is not a valid source. I'm not sure if that other source is valid either.
  • Intro needs to be expanded.
  • No description?
  • -- 1358 (Talk) 16:25, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
Fett
  • The article must adhere to the Manual of Style and WP:S. I'm seeing various sourcing issues, grammatical errors, and multiple linking (most notable your ref tags). Since we do have a Galaxies source template, you may also use it for the ref tags. Allakhazam is not a valid source, since it's mainly a fansite. Also didn't the tcg have a card that featured this Oasis? If so, then you could use the card template and add the info in the source section. JangFett (Talk) 16:50, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
    • Okay, I think I fixed the grammar issues. I still need to fix the sourcing however. I also dont think there is a TCG card for this, but I'll look into itLexx Yovel 15:54, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

  1. ACvote Idle objection period reached. Brought to my attention by Xd. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:12, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 19:25, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Chack Jadson (Talk) 19:59, August 20, 2010 (UTC)