- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Hunter/Hunted
- Nominated by: 501st dogma(talk) 12:15, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: with the help of Menk, I've created my first OOU article
(4 ACs/3 Users/7 Total)
Support
IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 05:05, March 10, 2013 (UTC)- Supreme Emperor (talk) 21:04, March 19, 2013 (UTC)
- Winterz (talk) 17:57, March 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Sir Cavalier of One
(Squadron channel) 19:58, March 25, 2013 (UTC) - Stake black msg 20:26, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
- —Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 02:15, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
- Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:43, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
Object
Floyd
Cut down on the semicolons.- Cut one out.
Also, some of the sentences in the Plot summary section really go on a little to long. Not good for flow.IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 01:20, March 8, 2013 (UTC)
Winterz
In the plot summary you mention the Capture of the Emperor's Will (and several others) however there's no sight of it(them) in the appearances, so I'm a fit confused. If you're summing up the plots before this adventure and which, were not mentioned here, then you need to correct the references.Winterz (talk) 12:54, March 13, 2013 (UTC)- The referencing is correct, as they are plannning to capture the Emperor's Will. However they don't manage to do that in this scenario. I linked to the capture because the event occures later, and linking's always good. 501st dogma(talk) 13:57, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
- If those are not mentioned in this adventure then they should not be referenced to it, wouldn't you agree? You should probably ref those assessments to the respective adventures/sources where they happen. Winterz (talk) 14:35, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think the capture of E's W needs to be reffed, as I'm only pipelinking to it, and they are inent on capturing the galleon. I can unlink it if you want, if that will make it any better. 501st dogma(talk) 15:18, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
- No sir, that's not what I mean (note that I'm not reffering only to that battle). You've added a prelude plot and that is great, but you cannot reference it to this adventure because it does not mention it whatsoever. You must ref it to the respective ones. Winterz (talk) 15:38, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
- I am. The little prelude part is reffed to the book in general, while the part about the frigate getting the route plan is reffed to the previous adventure. 501st dogma(talk) 15:43, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
- Alright, but please notice that even then there are some missing appearances which are linked and referenced in this article (Realspace, time, bridge, etc.).
- That better?
- Alright, but please notice that even then there are some missing appearances which are linked and referenced in this article (Realspace, time, bridge, etc.).
- I am. The little prelude part is reffed to the book in general, while the part about the frigate getting the route plan is reffed to the previous adventure. 501st dogma(talk) 15:43, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
- No sir, that's not what I mean (note that I'm not reffering only to that battle). You've added a prelude plot and that is great, but you cannot reference it to this adventure because it does not mention it whatsoever. You must ref it to the respective ones. Winterz (talk) 15:38, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think the capture of E's W needs to be reffed, as I'm only pipelinking to it, and they are inent on capturing the galleon. I can unlink it if you want, if that will make it any better. 501st dogma(talk) 15:18, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
- If those are not mentioned in this adventure then they should not be referenced to it, wouldn't you agree? You should probably ref those assessments to the respective adventures/sources where they happen. Winterz (talk) 14:35, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
- The referencing is correct, as they are plannning to capture the Emperor's Will. However they don't manage to do that in this scenario. I linked to the capture because the event occures later, and linking's always good. 501st dogma(talk) 13:57, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
Interdictor is a disambig page and should not be linked ;).Winterz (talk) 16:23, March 13, 2013 (UTC)- Considering the main image (and for some other reasons), it would be best in the intro if you introduced it as the "seventh" and not "second last". Winterz (talk) 00:58, March 18, 2013 (UTC)
- There you go.
Cav
- First thing - I moved the image to the right to stop it interfering with the section headings.
How did the Far Orbit obtain the route of the Emperor's Will?- Done.
Why are interdictors actively searching for the Far Orbit?- Is that better?
I think it needs to be clear when introducing each possible option what the pros and cons of such a move is, if any are listed. Also, the two sub options for "Fleeing to the nebula" should be combined if possible to avoid a single sentence section.- The two can't really be connected, as they are two seperate paths. I've added the pros and cons that I could find. Is that better? I kinda had to encorporate them into the paths.
Though the adventure says that boarding that the counterattack via boarding is the preferred path, - I think you have a few too many words here. Please clarify.- Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 10:12, March 20, 2013 (UTC)
Toprawa
I feel like that shuttle should have its own article.Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:15, March 25, 2013 (UTC)- I disagree. Its just a random shuttle that the Far Orbit picked up somewhere, and additionaly, it's only mention is in the path that we deem non-canon here. 501st dogma(talk) 20:52, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
- Well, doesn't that speak to its uniqueness? The fact that it's not even one of the frigate's regularly assigned shuttles, but one it picked up specially and added to its complement? This shuttle seems like it has a fairly unique history, which seems to me like it would perhaps be deserving of an article. And whether a subject is non-canon or not doesn't have any bearing on whether or not an article should be created for it. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:54, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
- There you go. 501st dogma(talk) 23:30, March 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:43, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
- There you go. 501st dogma(talk) 23:30, March 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Well, doesn't that speak to its uniqueness? The fact that it's not even one of the frigate's regularly assigned shuttles, but one it picked up specially and added to its complement? This shuttle seems like it has a fairly unique history, which seems to me like it would perhaps be deserving of an article. And whether a subject is non-canon or not doesn't have any bearing on whether or not an article should be created for it. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:54, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
- I disagree. Its just a random shuttle that the Far Orbit picked up somewhere, and additionaly, it's only mention is in the path that we deem non-canon here. 501st dogma(talk) 20:52, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 20:43, April 2, 2013 (UTC)