Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Horax/Legends

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Horax

After brief IRC review. 1358 ^(Talk) 18:47, February 10, 2014 (UTC)
Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:38, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
The linking could have been better.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 07:26, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
- Holy crap, I didn't realize we had articles on all these body parts. :P MasterFred^(Whatever) 03:01, February 14, 2014 (UTC)
Sir Cavalier of One^{(Squadron channel)} 09:40, February 27, 2014 (UTC)
501st dogma^(talk) 21:30, March 1, 2014 (UTC)
Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 06:48, March 20, 2014 (UTC)
IFYLOFD ^{(Enter the Floydome)} 02:08, March 21, 2014 (UTC)

~~Color needs linking in the infobox.~~ Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:59, February 11, 2014 (UTC)
- Fixed. MasterFred^(Whatever) 00:23, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
I think the campaign guide deserves a mention in the bts since it gave role-playing info on the creature which is worth mentioning. Isn't there also another illustration from that book?I doesn't need to be added but the artist could be mentioned. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:59, February 11, 2014 (UTC)
- We don't list roleplaying numbers unless those numbers can be reinterpreted into prose for the body. Everything that's represented by the numbers in the Guide has already been affirmed elsewhere, and the article references those other sources. As for the artist, meh. It's just a drawing. MasterFred^(Whatever) 00:15, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
  - I'm not saying any numbers should be listed in the article, but I think the fact that there are numbers should be mentioned. The context of its appearance in the book is significant enough to deserve a mention. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:26, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
    - We only mention items in BTSs that bring something significant and new to the topic's canon. There is nothing that is presented in the CG that is both significant and new, and a few roleplaying numbers is hardly worth noting. MasterFred^(Whatever) 06:20, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
      - I've gone ahead and mentioned it was in the game. MasterFred^(Whatever) 06:35, February 12, 2014 (UTC)

~~I believe that its sentience should be mentioned in the intro~~
~~The behavior section should mention how they eat siltcrawlers, as they are a part of the horax's diet. It should also be mentioned that they are carnivorous in that section.~~
~~Also in the behavior section, you could add how they liked a warm climate, and did not fair well in a cold one.~~
Good work. 501st dogma^(talk) 00:03, February 17, 2014 (UTC)
- All handled. MasterFred^(Whatever) 20:36, March 1, 2014 (UTC)

~~"They could grow over fifteen meters tall and were extremely dangerous." Dangerous to who?~~
- De-Fredified JangFett ^(Talk) 03:10, March 19, 2014 (UTC)
~~"The carnivorous horaxes were solitary creatures, choosing to live their lives alone." Redundant.~~ IFYLOFD ^{(Enter the Floydome)} 04:20, March 3, 2014 (UTC)
- Addressed JangFett ^(Talk) 03:10, March 19, 2014 (UTC)

~~Same BTS objection as I left before on your previous CW nomination about the episode dates.~~ Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:18, March 11, 2014 (UTC)
- How's that? JangFett ^(Talk) 03:10, March 19, 2014 (UTC)
~~The Databank cannot be used as a source for the 19 BBY date. You know the drill.~~ Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:52, March 11, 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if the year was really necessary since I can't find anything that indicates before 19 BBY or during for that matter. `JangFett ^(Talk)
It has been the practice of TCW articles to list DVD/Blu-ray releases for specific seasons when something from the DVD's bonus content contains unique information. This article is an example where I think this practice should apply. The Sources list should list Star Wars: Clone Wars: Volume Two, and that item should have the 1stID tag attached to it, not the episode itself in the Appearances list. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:10, March 12, 2014 (UTC)
- Addressed JangFett ^(Talk) 03:10, March 19, 2014 (UTC)

Idle objections two weeks old. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:51, March 17, 2014 (UTC)