Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Hewett

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Hewett

You should probably alphabetize the categories. Otherwise, good work. 501st dogma^(talk) 16:36, July 7, 2013 (UTC)
Commander Code-8 ^{You lost the game!} 00:56, July 11, 2013 (UTC)
Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:13, July 11, 2013 (UTC)
Sir Cavalier of One^{(Squadron channel)} 11:13, July 24, 2013 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 04:33, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
Trip391 (talk) 19:28, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
Winterz (talk) 05:12, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:21, August 21, 2013 (UTC)

~~Could you say that Qui-Gon was talking to Adi Gallia in the intro quote attribution?~~
~~I'm guessing the Hewett senators were Republic ones, if so can you mention the GR somewhere.~~ Commander Code-8 ^{You lost the game!} 09:51, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
- I've done the first, but I don't feel comfortable asserting the second. From my reading of the text, it is not clear that they would necessarily be Republic senators. --Eyrezer (talk) 11:21, July 9, 2013 (UTC)

~~Even though, I'm assuming, it was that way in the source, shouldn't Konkeel pie be lowercase, like most other food ex: Chuba stew Bilerat stew?~~
- Your assumption is right that it is capitalized in the original source. My general preference is therefore to keep it that way. --Eyrezer (talk) 01:23, August 17, 2013 (UTC)
The last sentence in the intro says: "and the Jedi Master Qui-Gon Jinn almost ate some of pie before being prevented by his contemporary". Since Jedi Master is used as a title, do we need the "the"; also, "ate some of pie".
- Hmm, I think the use of the definite article here is okay. --Eyrezer (talk) 09:29, July 10, 2013 (UTC)
~~In the third sentence of History, it says: "and Master Jinn almost ate of the food before Master Gallia stopped him~~
- Do we still have the "sofixit" principle on this site? By which I mean to say that I would be happy for you to correct these minor errors if they occur in the future. Now fixed.--Eyrezer (talk) 09:23, July 10, 2013 (UTC)
  - Wasn't really sure what I could go in and edit, or what has to be brought up here, didn't want to step on any toes. Trip391 (talk) 19:02, July 14, 2013 (UTC)
Also in History, the last sentence of the first paragraph says: "Jinn related the incident to his Padawan Obi-Wan Kenobi, insisting that Gallia had saved his life." Shouldn't it be "to his Padawan, Obi-Wan Kenobi,"? Trip391 (talk) 19:40, July 9, 2013 (UTC)

Just a little thing, the whole "planet of x" is generaly disencouraged unless utterly necessary. I don't think there's that necessity here, so I believe the "of" should go (both in the intro and history sections). Winterz (talk) 15:32, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
- As I originally wrote it, it was as you suggest. Another editor added the 'of'. I didn't feel strongly enough either way to revert it but if you do, I would be happy to see them gone. --Eyrezer (talk) 23:13, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
  - Yeah, I really think you should return it to its original state on that part. Winterz (talk) 01:43, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
    - This strikes me as a perfect candidate for WP:BOLD, one of my favourite polices on the Wook. I would encourage you to be bold in your reviews and fix these kinds of small issues, rather than raise it on the reviewing page. In my experience, this is typically far more efficient for all concerned! Cheers. --Eyrezer (talk) 03:32, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
      - I would've done so but in similar and common situations like these, in my reviewing experience (smaller than yours yes), it's better to leave an objection pointing out in order to see if the nominator understands why and if he doesn't, it would teach him why. Winterz (talk) 05:10, August 19, 2013 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:21, August 21, 2013 (UTC)