- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.
Givin
(-2)
Support
- Almost fully sourced, it looks splendid.--Domlith 12:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Oppose
- As someone who has this article on his to-do list, it could be expanded a lot. Also has a [source?], and the common names section should be made into a prosified paragraph. --
dmirableAckbar (It's A Trap!) 17:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC) - Needs expansion. Chack Jadson Talk 19:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- "Almost fully sourced"? Ugh, no. Please fully source any article before nominating it. And yes, expansion is needed for this as well. Greyman(Paratus) 16:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Comments