- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Ghoel
- Nominated by: Menkooroo 07:16, August 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Slurp.
(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
Support
- Good job. I remember when the article looked like this. :) Hanzo Hasashi 17:16, August 30, 2011 (UTC)
- You got that one written up lickety-split! ~Savage
12:47, September 5, 2011 (UTC) - --Cal Jedi
(Personal Comm Channel) 22:49, September 23, 2011 (UTC)
IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 00:44, September 24, 2011 (UTC)
The Speciesist in me says yuck. CC7567 (talk) 21:36, October 8, 2011 (UTC)
—Tommy 9281 Sunday, October 9, 2011, 00:51 UTC
Object
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 00:51, October 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reviews, guys. :) Just a note to Bob that I removed the "Human" designations for Han and Luke; I personally don't really care about them, but species designators have been removed by later reviewers in the last few GANs of mine that you added them to. If there's already context like "smuggler" or "Rebel General" or something, it seems that further context isn't really necessary. Menkooroo 15:29, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
- It's an odd practice to designate Chewbacca as a Wookiee and Jabba as a Hutt, but not to designate Solo and Skywalker as Humans. Smacks of speciesism, if that's a word. :) If you don't care about them why remove them, though? ~Savage
15:55, September 5, 2011 (UTC) - It also occurs to me that this may not be the proper place to hash out such notions, so feel free to tell me to bugger off to the Senate Hall. I'll try to set up a thread later tonight! ~Savage
17:17, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
- It's an odd practice to designate Chewbacca as a Wookiee and Jabba as a Hutt, but not to designate Solo and Skywalker as Humans. Smacks of speciesism, if that's a word. :) If you don't care about them why remove them, though? ~Savage