Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Galdros

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Galdros
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Braha
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Galdros

  • Nominated by: Lewisr (talk) 21:59, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Thanks to Spooky for the image help
  • Date Archived: 03:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 554 words (128 introduction, 345 body, 81 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:THR WP:COMICS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 13:34, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
  2. Solid! LieutenantNaps (talk) 17:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 22:58, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
  4. ACvote copy-edit —spookywillowwtalk 00:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Fan26 (Talk) 03:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Object

Braha
  • Not sure about introducing the pipelinked "leader" for the Eye and then mentioning the Eye unlinked. Their should be a link between those, even in the intro.
  • "who the Jedi who suspected was the former Eye and was believed killed" who the Jedi who?
  • Having the two Jedi after a mention of the Jedi is a recipe for confusion. Is it referring to Keeve's pair? Or Galdo's pair? Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 21:31, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
    • Thanks for spotting those, all fixed Lewisr (talk) 21:39, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Comments

  • I think "counterstrike against the Nihil, and with the believed death of their suspected Eye" could maybe be split into two sentences. i.e. "counterstrike against the Nihil. With the believed death of the Nihil's suspected Eye". I think the sentence can still work fine as it is, which is why I'm not objecting, so it's up to your discretion! LieutenantNaps (talk) 17:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the suggestion! I did split it so thanks again for chekcing over and spotting Lewisr (talk) 17:12, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 03:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)