Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/GT-9R

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

GT-9R

(+5)

Support

  1. To go with my FA, Tirog. —Silly Dan (talk) 02:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. --Eyrezer 03:16, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
  3. Good. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:18, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
  4. Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 09:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
  5. Thefourdotelipsis 12:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Toprawa
    • Please remove this speculation. The identical "blue sun" should be enough to let the reader come to his own assumption: "possibly the same marketplace GT-9R visited with Tirog."
    • I can't really cite policy on this one, but please consider changing the title of the "Personality & traits" section to "Characteristics" in light of this being a droid character. This is the direction our recent droid character FAs are going.
      • If that's how we're writing droid character articles now, OK. I'm not sure why we should have a different layout for organic and non-organic characters, though. (Droid models should have a different layout from typical character articles, obviously.) —Silly Dan (talk) 21:26, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
    • You're kind of backpedaling on what you're saying here, which tells me you're unsure based on the evidence and may potentially be extrapolating. Please reword as appropriate: "GT-9R did not enjoy combat. Even if he did" Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:22, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
      • No, I'm not, but I can see where you'd get that impression. The intention there was to say that even if he had enjoyed combat (which was not the case) he wasn't programmed to use weapons. Reworded to "He would not have been a capable combatant anyway, since his programming did not allow him to use weapons." —Silly Dan (talk) 21:26, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Comments

  • This one has a P&T section, but no skills section (presumably he had standard protocol droid skills, but it's not specifically stated in either book.) —Silly Dan (talk) 02:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)