Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Fia (Human)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Fia (Human)
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 501st
        • 1.1.2.2 Attack of the Clone
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Fia (Human)

  • Nominated by: Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 08:31, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Wrench Wench

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. 501st dogma(talk) 14:08, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
  2. ACvote—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 01:15, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 17:36, July 12, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Cumulonimbus Cloud (ℳeeting ℛoom) 19:14, July 12, 2012 (UTC)
  5. ACvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 02:54, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
  6. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 01:03, July 19, 2012 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • Date of birth in at least the bio.
    • Added to intro and bio.
  • That's all. 501st dogma(talk) 11:38, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review. - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 11:52, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
Attack of the Clone
  • Is the 11 BBY date coming from using math with the 8 ABY date? If so, it should be "circa" 11 BBY, because we don't know if her birthday had already passed or not in 8 ABY to make her eighteen, or if she was turning nineteen later that year. CC7567 (talk) 04:42, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
    • To be honest, if we start doing that, we'll have to "circa" nearly every birthdate on the Wook since official birthdays are never stated. But in this case, it is clearly stated that she is nineteen at the time of the adventure. If an actual age is clearly stated and the year of the statement is known, I don't think "circa" would apply in this case. - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 07:15, July 18, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 01:03, July 19, 2012 (UTC)