Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Falloo

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Falloo
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Editor
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Falloo

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Writing articles based on a story with no text is a fun challenge, especially given how cute this story was
  • Date Archived: 01:40, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 612 words (136 introduction, 412 body, 64 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Women, Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Ewoks

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 01:25, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
  2. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 01:44, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
  3. ACvote I personally think the intent is pretty clear though we can't go offa twitter likes Fan26 (Talk) 23:07, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
  4. Lewisr (talk) 00:36, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
  5. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 01:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Object

Editor
  • Need to note in BTS Alyssa Wong's tweet also confirms the character's gender
    • Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 06:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
  • I'd say the fact that Alyssa Wong responded to a tweet specifically asking if they were a couple is by far enough to confirm they had a romantic relationship Editoronthewiki (talk) 22:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
    • Also she liked this https://twitter.com/QueerSWatch/status/1646230640625369089 Editoronthewiki (talk) 22:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
      • As much as I'd like to confirm that they're a couple I disagree that it being a reply to that or Alyssa liking a tweet is enough to do so. I considered it myself initially but realized it would be confirmation bias since both actions could be interpreted to mean many things. We should stick to explicit confirmations on author intent stuff otherwise we might end up misinterpreting something and putting words in someone's mouth. Ayrehead02 (talk) 06:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
        • I disagree. Could other users maybe respond to see what they think? Editoronthewiki (talk) 18:13, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
        • I'm with Ayre - we shouldn't be sourcing things to tweet likes. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 01:51, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
        • Per J-Mac. LucaRoR Sigil of House Serenno (Talk) 17:15, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 01:38, 20 May 2023 (UTC)