Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Expeditionary Library

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Expeditionary Library

  • Nominated by: 501st dogma(talk) 17:18, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Your typical library branch

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 12:49, March 16, 2015 (UTC)
  2. Manoof (talk) 06:36, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
  3. ACvote IFYLOFD (Talk) 04:40, April 9, 2015 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:18, April 10, 2015 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 00:40, April 10, 2015 (UTC)

Object

  • You have 2 references for the created attribute, but in the History section you only reference the year to the second of those. Is there a reason for this that I'm unaware of? Manoof (talk) 10:23, March 13, 2015 (UTC)
    • That's because the infobox date needs both the date ref and the source ref to say that it was created prior to so and so. History just needs a date ref to source a date.
      • Ah ok, I just thought double references should be combined into one, but that makes sense. Manoof (talk) 06:36, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
  • Should "Galactic Alliance–Imperial Remnant" instead be "Galactic Alliance/Imperial Remnant", or maybe "a combined Galactic Alliance–Imperial Remnant"? Manoof (talk) 10:23, March 13, 2015 (UTC)
    • It should work as it is.
  • "space wise" and "divvied up" seem very unencyclopedic, maybe change the wording in these sentences? Manoof (talk) 10:23, March 13, 2015 (UTC)
    • "space wise" is perfectly fine, and it seems that Cav has changed "divvied up" to "partitioned" so we don't have to worry about that anymore.
  • You seem to be missing something in the last sentence of the description's first paragraph. Manoof (talk) 10:23, March 13, 2015 (UTC)
    • It was a "was", and Cav fixed it.
  • Should "all storied in book form" be "all stored"? Manoof (talk) 10:23, March 13, 2015 (UTC)
    • Yes, remedied.
  • Double checked your links, I noticed you linked to Chiss twice in the description. Manoof (talk) 10:23, March 13, 2015 (UTC)
    • A single repeated link does not necessarily mean that there is linking issues throughout. If you notice single one in the future, it's better to just fix it in a copyedit.
      • Good point, I'll keep that in mind in future. Manoof (talk) 06:36, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
  • The first sentence of the History is massive, maybe split it up somewhere? Manoof (talk) 10:23, March 13, 2015 (UTC)
    • Eh, it should have been good as it was because of the semi-colon, but Cav cut it in half already so we can leave it like that.
  • If "millions, possibly billions" is someone's belief/opinion maybe clarify that, offhand it otherwise seems like speculation. Manoof (talk) 10:23, March 13, 2015 (UTC)
    • That's straight from the source. It's unclear there too. Thanks for the review. 501st dogma(talk) 03:03, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
      • No worries, for some reason I read it in Luke's voice, from Jedi Outcast, which is probably why I thought maybe someone said that in the book :P Manoof (talk) 06:36, March 20, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 00:46, April 10, 2015 (UTC)