Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Escape from Darth Vader (World of Reading)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Escape from Darth Vader (World of Reading)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 21:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
— Samonic 07:54, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
—spookywilloww^talk 19:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Let's not take 2 years this time Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 08:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
The bane of the GAN. 1358 ^(Talk) 15:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Perhaps this ("The title, designed for readers ages 6-8,[2] retells situations and events previously depicted in full in the original Star Wars film.[10]") could be changed to this ("The title, designed for readers ages 6-8,[2] retells situations and events previously depicted in full in the original Star Wars film, Star Wars: Episode IV A New Hope, originally called Star Wars.[10]") Samonic (Ah, yes. The negotiator.) 13:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Adjusted. Dentface (talk) 23:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

~~What's the need for the "final-page illustration only" note?~~

~~Missing external links section.~~ JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 19:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Context: Added.
- So, at the very end of the book there's one last page that says "And a new journey was about to begin for R2-D2 and C-3PO," featuring a poster-style illustration with Leia, Luke, Han, Chewbacca, Vader, the Death Star, and some starfighters. Nobody on the page is mentioned by name and none of them is featured anywhere else in the story, which is why I think a previous editor included the "final-page illustration only" note. If you would like me to remove it, I can. I don't feel strongly about it one way or another.
- External links was there, just hiding underneath the multimedia template. I've reordered it to fit the proper MOS guidelines. Dentface (talk) 20:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
  - That'll do it :P JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 21:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

~~I think the final-page illustration only notes in the appearances section can be removed~~
~~0 BBY should be used in the timeline field of the infobox and the events section of the infobox~~ Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 02:44, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- Appearances: Done.
- Dating: Done. Dentface (talk) 07:17, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
  - Sorry, I meant to say events section of the appearances for 0 BBY too Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 01:01, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
    - Sorry, I'm not sure I'm following. Am I supposed to hyperlink 0 BBY in the events section of the appearances? I haven't seen that done before. Do you have an example so I make sure I'm doing that correctly? Dentface (talk) 06:09, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
      - Yes that's what I'm asking for, it hasn't been done in past OOU status articles but it seems like an appropriate thing to include. For exact placement I think putting it as a subbullet of Age of the Empire will be fine Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 13:59, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
        Added. :) Dentface (talk) 06:30, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 15:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)