Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Edi Wedd

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was withdrawn. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Edi Wedd
    • 1.1 (0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Edi Wedd

  • Nominated by: GenralHux (talk) 19:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: If I had a dime for every spider-like Separatist mastermind...
  • Date Archived: 19:11, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 975 words (188 introduction, 727 body, 60 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

Comments

  • Noting per point 10 on Wookieepedia:Good article nominations 'Users must successfully complete one Good article nomination before they can have two nominations active on the GAN page at one time'. So for now this will need to be taken down until your current one passes Lewisr (talk) 19:05, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
    • Well that sucks. I was hoping to hedge my bets with two nominations. Sorry for my continued flouting of the nomination rules; I genuinely was not aware of them, and I apologize. GenralHux (talk) 19:06, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
      • It's no problem, just be sure to read the 'A Good article must…' and 'How to nominate:' points on the GAN page, or feel free to ask if you're unsure of anything Lewisr (talk)
        • I will. Again my apologies. GenralHux (talk) 19:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)