Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Dogfight above Dac

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Dogfight above Dac

  • Nominated by: Menkooroo 06:19, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Legacy was doing Battles of Mon Cala before it was cool.

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 13:17, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Clone Commander Lee Talk 17:22, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
  3. --Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 03:54, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
  4. ToRsO bOy 17:17, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Comment below. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:29, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
  6. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 13:44, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

Object

ToRsO bOy
  • "...fellow Sith Lord Darth Wyyrlok" Can you change this to Regent? Wyyrlok was more than a fellow Sith Lord.
    • Done. Good suggestion; I like this better.
  • How about adding a mention of the Empire-in-exile's contributions to the evacuation?
    • I think that going into any more detail about the Evacuation of Dac would be straying too far from the subject at hand. For the purposes of the "aftermath" section, I feel like noting that the Alliance drove the Imperial forces away and then got the evacuation going is enough information to let the reader know the direct consequences of the dogfight --- getting into how the evacuation proceeded and who showed up late to the party would, IMO, seem like a bit much. General Jaeger's contribution is relevant to the Evacuation, for sure, but I don't think it's too relevant to this particular dogfight. Does that make sense?
      • I get you. It's a minor point really. I saw you referenced Jaeger's on the quote so I thought it would be better if he was mentioned on the article.
  • That's all I can find. Great article ToRsO bOy 22:05, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review! Good to see your face around here. :) Menkooroo 05:13, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
      • No problem. Been trying to get more time in but laziness keeps winning. ToRsO bOy 17:17, October 14, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 13:44, October 26, 2011 (UTC)


  • Because I'm sure you'll be wondering, I changed "ten percent" to "10 percent" in the article, because this is how percentage numbers are displayed according to real-world AP style. We don't have an actual stylistic policy on this, of course, so you're welcome to change it, but I think this is most appropriate for our article-reading purposes here. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:23, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
    • Sounds good. Thanks for the copy-edit and review. Menkooroo 08:26, October 24, 2011 (UTC)