Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Dej Vennor

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Dej Vennor
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Dej Vennor

  • Nominated by: 501st dogma(talk) 20:16, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The first of my Far Orbit GANs!

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 14:24, October 31, 2012 (UTC)
  2. I initially thought this guy was Mandalorian. Commander Code-8 To say hi, press 42 08:00, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 21:01, December 12, 2012 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:32, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote Menkooroo (talk) 04:24, December 17, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Toprawa
  • I think the intro could probably be expanded a little. Like mentioning the fact that he was rumored to be a former Imperial scout trooper and wore modified scout trooper armor. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:15, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
    • Added. Do you want it to be expanded more? 501st dogma(talk) 22:38, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
      • It's better now.
  • I would strongly suggest moving the bulk of the text from the P/T into an "Equipment" section. This section should additionally detail his starship, whatever blaster rifle he has slung on his back, and his force pike thing he's holding in his hand. It may also be desirable to expand the P/T slightly. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:16, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
    • Done, though there was not much that I could add to the P/T. I found some more equipment in the book. 501st dogma(talk) 23:27, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
      • The P/T section is now unsourced. Also, the addition to the new Equipment section misspelled the word "also" and failed to include ending punctuation. These are certainly "sofixit" objections, but I bring them to your attention in a plea for you to pay greater attention to your work when you're typing. These lazy errors really shouldn't be happening in status article nominations, especially an article this short. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:53, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
        • Gah. Its been tiddied. Sorry about that. 501st dogma(talk) 12:16, December 15, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:16, December 17, 2012 (UTC)