Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Dawn Pyramid of Aargau

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Dawn Pyramid of Aargau

• Nominated by: graestan^(talk) 22:03, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Wonder of wonders, miracle of miracles.

(3 ACs/3 Users/5 Total)

Support

1. Cavalier One^{(Squadron channel)} 19:58, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
2. Plagueis327 21:31, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
3. NaruHina ^Talk 17:02, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
4. Master Jonathan (Holocomm) Friday, February 10, 2012, 19:07 UTC
5. 1358 ^(Talk) 19:48, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
6. Man, I'm glad I called that guy. Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:07, February 11, 2012 (UTC)

Object

1. Any particular reason you list the galactic coordinates of Aargau? If it's just to show its position on the galactic map, we don't use that on structure articles. Simply say what planet it's on. NaruHina ^Talk 00:54, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
   • The coordinates are not listed, and were not prior to your edit, either. I do not know what you are talking about. graestan^(talk) 04:31, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
     • I believe he's referring to this under Description: "a planet in the Zug system located at coordinates L-10". Master Jon ^{Council Chambers} Friday, February 10, 2012, 05:09 UTC
       • Ah, thank you. Here I checked the infobox under "location." In response, I do not see any rule against listing the coordinates, and listed it for better ease of finding Aargau and seeing how far from Rafa it was. graestan^(talk) 05:52, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
         • Well, so long as there was design. Sorry I forgot about this. I've been swamped recently. Dx NaruHina ^Talk 17:02, February 10, 2012 (UTC)

From the Council Chambers:

• "They covered every body in their home system with pyramids and other constructs": What kind of body? Celestial, human, etc.
  • They other constructs were similar, I simply did not want to have to reference the Lando Calrissian Adventures book. Should I? graestan^(talk) 05:52, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
    • I'm not asking about the constructs, I'm asking about the word "body" (fourth word in what I quoted). You need to clarify what "body" means. Master Jon ^{Training Room} Friday, February 10, 2012, 18:20 UTC
      • Can you think of a better word for every planet, asteroid, and moon? The word "celestial" is out of the question considering its usage to describe a concurrent civilization. graestan^(talk) 18:33, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
        • Try "astronomical object". Master Jon _{Council Chambers} Friday, February 10, 2012, 19:00 UTC
          • Fair enough. You are more than welcome to make that type of edit to whatever I write in the future. graestan^(talk) 19:04, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
• And that's it. Nice job, and good to see you back. Master Jon ^{Council Chambers} Friday, February 10, 2012, 05:09 UTC
  • Thank you. graestan^(talk) 19:04, February 10, 2012 (UTC)

Toprawa

• A couple minor things. Maybe I'm just not reading this right, but I'm sort of confused over what this ending clause is supposed to be saying. Can we clarify this at all? "and had inspired the theme of architecture for the planet."
  • I moved it and expanded it, Steve. Tell me what you think. graestan^(talk) 05:06, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
    • Much better. Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:07, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
• Is it really necessary to provide this context for Duro here? I think it could go without in this instance. "...and the Valley of Royalty on Duro, a Core World..." Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:49, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • Good point, Steve. Removed. graestan^(talk) 05:06, February 11, 2012 (UTC)

Comments