Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Dao's flagship

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Dao's flagship

  • Nominated by: Erebus Chronus (Talk) 17:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The Ryloth Project continues :P
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:TCW

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. Very nice work. Loving the coverage with the Ryloth events. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 23:26, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
  2. —spookywillowwtalk 23:57, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Commander Code-8 Hello There! 07:14, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
  4. Per Braha'tok enthusiast.— Samonic ChissAscendancyCanonSymbol 11:33, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
  5. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 18:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
  6. ACvote OOM 224 10:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Object

Spooky
  • As Coruscant being a planet can be sourced to Battles that Changed the Galaxy, might you consider removing the Helmet Collection ref and replacing it with that, since it's also used elsewhere prior? For referencing minimization; though helps the fact that it's more accessible.—spookywillowwtalk 22:42, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
  • The article title and the role it implies needs to be reflected in the article proper, as well as the introduction bold text part.
    • There.
  • "The bridge also provided its crew with a 180-degree view of the surrounding space from a series of viewports, while the Star Destroyer was also equipped with a main reactor and a deflector shield generator, and was armed with weapon systems." The second half of this sentence doesn't really have anything to do with the first half. 1358 (Talk) 08:57, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Review note: not every sentence needs to be connected to the previous one with "in addition to", "furthermore" etc. If sentences have nothing to do with each other, it's fine to leave them standing alone. 1358 (Talk) 18:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Just a question before I jump in: the Legends article is titled Dao's flagship; is there any reason the Canon article doesn't follow this naming convention (or Dao's command ship)? I feel like we should be avoiding long clunky Unidentified titles if possible. 1358 (Talk) 20:20, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

  • I just created it with this title because I didn't know if Dao's flagship was best. But if it matters where it is, then I'll move it. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 20:33, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 10:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)