Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/DX-2 disruptor blaster pistol

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

DX-2 disruptor blaster pistol

  • Nominated by: Wok142 (talk) 17:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Went over from CAN
  • Date Archived: 22:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 345 words (45 introduction, 196 body, 104 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 326 words (44 introduction, 178 body, 104 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Novels

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. CometSmudge (talk) 14:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
  2. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 19:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Zed42 Wolfpack emblem (talk) 11:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 23:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
  5. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 21:28, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Object

Comet
  • Since the card gives a reason for the Rebel Alliance ban, (Its destructive potential) I think you should add that. CometSmudge (talk) 01:40, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Makes sense to me, added. Wok142 (talk) 06:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Lew
  • The description should note the ID as the DX-2 disruptor pistol Lewisr (talk) 22:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Zed
  • Per other weapon articles like IQA-11 Blaster Rifle and K-16 Bryar Pistol, I feel like the last sentences of the Description regarding the bans and rebel use should instead go at the start of the History. (To go along with this, the timeline of the Imperial era can be specified for the part about disruptor weapons being banned across the galaxy.)
  • Also per the aforementioned articles, its color based on the image can be briefly noted as well. Zed42 Wolfpack emblem (talk) 22:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Braha
  • The body says that the Alliance prohibits the DX-2, but the intro says that they prohibit disruptors in general. Looking at the sources I think you should change the intro to match the body here. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 18:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 22:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)