Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/CompForce

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

CompForce

• Nominated by: --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 22:55, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• Date Archived: 04:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
• Final word count: 406 words (54 introduction, 262 body, 90 behind the scenes)
• Word count at nomination time: 375 words (54 introduction, 236 body, 85 behind the scenes)
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Lewisr (talk) 04:29, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
2. Wok142 (talk) 04:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
3. —spookywilloww^talk 17:41, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
4. SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 02:48, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
5. Booply (talk) 04:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Object

Lew

• Can you find a way to include special forces, currently is only in the infobox. Also regarding this, the page is categorised as such that it would be part of Imperial Special Forces, but this isn't really reflected anywhere on the page itself Lewisr (talk) 16:35, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Removed special forces as "elite" doesn't necessarily mean it's special forces. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 20:29, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
• It seems when you restructured the page to a GAN that it was part of Commission for the Preservation of the New Order and the context around it got left to only in the intro Lewisr (talk) 16:35, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Ah, added --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 20:29, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

spookly

• Do think it worth checking on whether Imperial Sourcebook does have one author as the Wook page seems to say; if so, this can be added to the BtS.
  • It is indeed one author --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 00:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
• Admittedly, I don't think any Description subsectioning is necessary here. The content seems like it can exist as three paragraphs (with role being added to one of the existing paragraphs). 2-3 paragraph subsections are standard for articles, sans History/Bio legacy sections or otherwise with large timegaps, and these ones also aren't too chunky so as to necessitate the extra headers. (It could be put in a different order for flow, though, post-sectioning removal, if that makes it read easier at all, but that part's entirely preference and just mentioning.)—spookywilloww^talk 04:42, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Removed subsectioning and shuffled it a bit, thanks! --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 00:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Wok

• I agree with spooky's above point about combining the sectioning. I would personally like to see the first para of what is currently the Organization section lead off because that feels like the most important information that contextualizes the info in the other paragraphs. Wok142 (talk) 00:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Objection has been addressed :) --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 00:28, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Yo

• Not sure if this needs fixing, but the abbreviation "COMPNOR" is introduced in the third sentence of the Description section before the full name of Commission for the Preservation of the New Order is established in the following sentence, which also establishes that CompForce is a unit within COMPNOR. You also have four sentences in a row in that same paragraph all beginning with "CompForce," so perhaps change the wording a bit for more variety. SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 22:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Reworded some --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 02:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 04:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)