Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Comm Datacore

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Comm Datacore

[16:36] <Toprawa> Jorrel, I want you to write the article on the Azzameen main data core

[16:36] <Jorrel> I can do that.

[16:36] <Jorrel> Any particular reason, Tope?

[16:37] <Toprawa> It would please me

I am pleased. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:40, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi (talk) 17:42, January 30, 2016 (UTC)
1358 ^(Talk) 00:28, February 1, 2016 (UTC)
Weird that it's never mentioned again. Who was the mole? Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:32, February 4, 2016 (UTC)
CC7567 ^(talk) 14:37, February 5, 2016 (UTC)

~~I'd recommend just removing the Azzameen Station image. It doesn't fit well and is extraneous.~~
- Gone.
The last sentence of the BTS really isn't necessary. It's like how sources vary between "battle cruiser" and "battlecruiser." Unless the variation is used expressly in the "Comm Datacore" name, that's pretty trivial. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:33, January 14, 2016 (UTC)
- Removed. Didn't consider the "battle cruiser" and "battlecruiser" comparison.
Sort of branching off the previous objection, certainly there must be a non-canon failed outcome to the mission to recover the datacore from the scrapyard, like if the container holding the datacore is destroyed or something. This should be detailed in the BTS. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:56, January 14, 2016 (UTC)
- This is actually one of the few that doesn't really delve into that possibility (like Azzameen Station had), instead just showing an automatic mission failure. I've made note of it, but I'm not sure it adds anything. ^Jorrel_Fraajic 04:04, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
  - I like it. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:40, January 15, 2016 (UTC)

~~Do the Azzameens find anything on a mole/traitor inside of the datacore? If so, I think you should note this.~~--Exiled Jedi (talk) 02:41, January 29, 2016 (UTC)
- It's never brought up again, actually. Aeron takes the core, Ace goes back to flying for the Rebels, and the next family mission is the retaking of Azzameen Home Base. ^Jorrel_Fraajic 16:41, January 29, 2016 (UTC)

There are two cases that have duplicate references in succession. The X-Wing Alliance game (ref note 1) is cited twice in the Description section: once at the end of "logging communications through the orbital installation owned and operated by the Azzameen family.[1]" and then again at the end of that paragraph.
The other case is the Prima Guide, which is cited twice successively in the last History paragraph: "who was leaking information regarding the family's affairs.[2] Her sources soon led her to Junkyard Control.[2]" Please check both of these cases to make sure that neither duplicate ref was intended to be a different source.
Both of these are nitpicking, so great work otherwise! CC7567 ^(talk) 06:49, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
- Oops. Thanks for catching those! ^Jorrel_Fraajic 08:14, February 5, 2016 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:22, February 5, 2016 (UTC)

Regarding the mole in the Azzameen organization: The game does reveal who is working against the Azzameens, but doesn't really say if the Comm Datacore was responsible for any part of this discovery. In fact, since the discovery sort of happens during a different mission and no mention is given to the datacore again, the datacore information was arguably worthless (When I say "sort of," I mean that there's no definitive discovery. There's a hint given in a mission that's immediately followed up by a reveal from the mole himself, but nothing between said missions that suggests the Comm Datacore wasn't used to confirm such suspicions. Can't write it out completely for this reason). For completion's sake, I added a note in the BTS stating as much, but I'd like some input as to the necessity/use of such a statement. ^Jorrel_Fraajic 08:14, February 5, 2016 (UTC)
- The addition sounds relevant to me. CC7567 ^(talk) 14:37, February 5, 2016 (UTC)