- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Capture of Even Piell
- Nominated by: CC7567 (talk) 01:26, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: WP:TCW. ~700 words from 17 seconds.
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
- Clone Commander Lee Talk 10:27, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- JangFett (Talk) 16:32, October 20, 2011 (UTC)
Cavalier One
(Squadron channel) 12:12, October 26, 2011 (UTC)- Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:13, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 18:34, October 30, 2011 (UTC)
Object
Cav
I think some small info on the resolution of the rescue mission might be warranted at the end of the aftermath section.- Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 10:55, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
- To be honest, I always feel that the resolution of following events isn't directly relevant to an article about a separate event. Doing so leaves different events distinct and separated, and while that isn't to say that such resolution info should remain exclusive to each event article, I always find myself including more info than there should be; I try to avoid writing off on tangents as much as possible. The rescue mission article is linked if the reader finds it interesting. Thanks for the look-see! CC7567 (talk) 00:59, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with you to a certain extent, and can see your reasoning. However, since Piell was captured with the intention of getting the Nexus Route information from him, shouldn't the fate of said information be mentioned at least even if the resolution of the rescue mission is omitted? Or would mentioning the fate of the Nexus Route info cause a larger tangential shift since the rescue mission would then have to be explained? - Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 09:33, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, that would be the case. Basically, the fate of the Nexus Route info is tied to the resolution; Piell dies and gives his half to Tano, and then there's problems between Tano and Tarkin about debriefing the intelligence with either the Jedi High Council or Palpatine. Adding said info wouldn't add too much length to the Piell's capture article, but it would progress a little too far from the original event. CC7567 (talk) 02:06, October 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm convinced. Of course, now I want to see the article on the rescue mission done ;) - Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 12:12, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm convinced. Of course, now I want to see the article on the rescue mission done ;) - Cavalier One
- Yeah, that would be the case. Basically, the fate of the Nexus Route info is tied to the resolution; Piell dies and gives his half to Tano, and then there's problems between Tano and Tarkin about debriefing the intelligence with either the Jedi High Council or Palpatine. Adding said info wouldn't add too much length to the Piell's capture article, but it would progress a little too far from the original event. CC7567 (talk) 02:06, October 20, 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with you to a certain extent, and can see your reasoning. However, since Piell was captured with the intention of getting the Nexus Route information from him, shouldn't the fate of said information be mentioned at least even if the resolution of the rescue mission is omitted? Or would mentioning the fate of the Nexus Route info cause a larger tangential shift since the rescue mission would then have to be explained? - Cavalier One
- To be honest, I always feel that the resolution of following events isn't directly relevant to an article about a separate event. Doing so leaves different events distinct and separated, and while that isn't to say that such resolution info should remain exclusive to each event article, I always find myself including more info than there should be; I try to avoid writing off on tangents as much as possible. The rescue mission article is linked if the reader finds it interesting. Thanks for the look-see! CC7567 (talk) 00:59, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
Toprawa
To appease the LG, might we change the title of "The battle" section to "The capture"?Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:12, October 27, 2011 (UTC)- Oops, completely overlooked that. Rectified. Thanks for the look. Oh, also: really minor, but what was the reasoning behind changing "Even Piell, Capture of" to "E" for the category sorting? CC7567 (talk) 22:56, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- AFAIK, adding anything beyond "E" doesn't accomplish anything. It still shows up in the category page under E as "Capture of Even Piell." If there's some way around that, you're certainly welcome to change it. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:13, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
- I think adding the rest of the title allows for better sorting category-wise; if there are other "E"s, then the "Even Piell" allows the article to be sorted with those instead of presented at the beginning of the "E"s, which may not be correct alphabet-wise. CC7567 (talk) 22:39, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, you're right. That's fine, then. I replaced it. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:42, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
- I think adding the rest of the title allows for better sorting category-wise; if there are other "E"s, then the "Even Piell" allows the article to be sorted with those instead of presented at the beginning of the "E"s, which may not be correct alphabet-wise. CC7567 (talk) 22:39, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
- AFAIK, adding anything beyond "E" doesn't accomplish anything. It still shows up in the category page under E as "Capture of Even Piell." If there's some way around that, you're certainly welcome to change it. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:13, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Oops, completely overlooked that. Rectified. Thanks for the look. Oh, also: really minor, but what was the reasoning behind changing "Even Piell, Capture of" to "E" for the category sorting? CC7567 (talk) 22:56, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:34, October 30, 2011 (UTC)