Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Cade Skywalker

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Cade Skywalker

  1. Mark14 18, July 2006 (UTC)
  2. StarNeptuneTalk to me! 01:16, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  3. Riffsyphon1024 14:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  4. Roron Corobb 8:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  5. Adamwankenobi 00:37, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Objections

  • Roron Corobb 9:09, 18 July 2006 (UTC) It could be a good article, but Star Wars: Legacy 2 isnt probably his last appearance forever, i think we should wait until Legacy progresses, and then we could add more content and then it could even be a featured article.
  • Although he's only been in a few comics, there is a wealth of info there. It's got all the makings of a Good Article, and once we get more content, it might even be FA material if we keep it at that level of quality. StarNeptuneTalk to me! 01:16, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Is it possible to be a good and featured article? Roron Corobb 10:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
    • This was discussed briefly in the Senate Hall thread. Basically, no. Featured staus overrides good status. --Eyrezer 23:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Then i think it shouldn't so it can be featured, because by Legacy 13, theres alot of information thats gonna be there. Look at all the info thats there now and only Legacy 2 is out. Or once an article is an official good article, could it still be nominated for featured? If not, no way. Roron Corobb 8:27, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • we know nothing barely on Cade as of yethis adventure has only just begun, as Roron said by legacy 13 this will want to be featured..Jedi Dude 16:19, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Ronon Corobb. The idea is that a good article can be converted into a featured article, as a promotion, just not both at the same time. So if Cade Skywalker became a good article that would not affect its chances of becoming featured. --Eyrezer 22:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Oh. Then i support it. Roron Corobb 8:30, July 19 2006 (UTC)

Comments

  • Must wait for more issues to then expand on him. -- Riffsyphon1024 14:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)