Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Buzza

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Buzza

  • Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 03:45, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: yub nub
  • Date Archived: 04:34, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 909 words (171 introduction, 650 body, 88 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 909 words (171 introduction, 655 body, 83 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Ewoks WP:Comics

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 04:57, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
  2. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 15:12, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
  3. ACvote ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 18:35, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
  4. Skifffy (talk) 03:06, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 04:33, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Object

Lew
  • There's a couple instances of "he/him" pronouns being used for Buzza. Might be leftover from before, but if not accurate to the sources (since you categorise with unspecified) then those should be changed Lewisr (talk) 20:06, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
spookly
  • I think the phrasing could be slightly tweaked to make clearer that Endor's considered Buzza's homeworld (per the infobox). Obviously, in the grander OOU context of Ewoks hailing from Endor, its almost always the case. But the phrasing in the Bio reads more like 'served in XX position...' and gives off the general vibe of the phrasing we'd use if someone was only known to have lived somewhere and held a position for the duration of time they were there.—spookywillowwtalk 03:50, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
    • Nothing actually explicitly says Buzza's homeworld was Endor, I just assumed it was because they're an Ewok and they're basically all from Endor, so would it be better if I just removed the homeworld from the infobox instead? CometSmudge (talk) 20:37, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
      • Haven't really read the source, but if that's the case, better to err on caution and remove. But if you do decide to keep it, the prose wording would need to match the infobox.—spookywillowwtalk 23:59, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
        • I took it out of the infobox just to be safe CometSmudge (talk) 00:25, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 04:33, 4 April 2025 (UTC)