Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Boba Fett and the Assassin Droids

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Boba Fett and the Assassin Droids
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/6 Users/9 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Toprawa:
        • 1.1.2.2 Xd
        • 1.1.2.3 A few things:
        • 1.1.2.4 Do you go into the store and steal groceries?
        • 1.1.2.5 Fett
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Boba Fett and the Assassin Droids

  • Nominated by: Skippy Farlstendoiro 15:55, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Let's rock!

(3 ACs/6 Users/9 Total)

Support

  1. Clone Commander Lee Talk 18:49, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Heh.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 21:26, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Imperialles 11:39, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Good work. -- 1358 (Talk) 14:55, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
  5. For the amount of information available, I didn't see anything that needed elaborated any more than what could be extrapolated and nothing really stood out at me. Did a typo and "it's" usage check, found none. Trak Nar Ramble on 07:29, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Dr. Phil doesn't believe you. Chack Jadson (Talk) 19:41, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
  7. --TK-299 (Click Here) Imperial Emblem 10:06, May 30, 2010 (UTC)
  8. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 02:49, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
  9. ACvote JangFett (Talk) 23:54, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Toprawa:
  • You currently link and reference to the GG6 disambig page. Please specify first and/or second edition. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:32, May 16, 2010 (UTC)
    • Done. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:22, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
Xd
  • Could you merge the two youmay templates? -- 1358 (Talk) 14:58, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
    • Like this? --Skippy Farlstendoiro 15:00, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • In the intro, you say that Boba Fett did not care about the band, however, in the "Organization" section, you state that experts believed that he would not care. Please decide which one is correct.
    • Better? --Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:36, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • That's it. -- 1358 (Talk) 17:19, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
A few things:
  • Alien is a humanocentric word; might be better to simply use the term "non-Human"
    • Let's say organic non-Humans to avoid confusion with droids, if you will. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:36, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Intro: "Boba Fett and the Assassin Droids was an underground musical group named after a famous bounty hunter and an illegal technology" This sentence presumes prior knowledge of both Fett and assassin droids. Reword it to something like "named after the bounty hunter Boba Fett and assassin droids, considered an illegal technology by the Galactic Empire." That way, you also eliminate the ugly links in the bolded part.
    • Done. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:36, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Intro: "in a vain attempt to stop them." Unsuccessful is probably a better word than vain in this context.
    • Done. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:36, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • History: "to be too dangerous for broadcasting." Dangerous how? Politically? Clarify.
    • Changed; this is all the OS specified. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:36, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • --Imperialles 17:30, May 17, 2010 (UTC)
Do you go into the store and steal groceries?
  • I don't. Why are we talking about my edible-obtaining habits? --Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:21, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
  • "Even if they lacked any real musical talent, they obtained a number of followers among non-Human communities." Should this be "even though?" Chack Jadson (Talk) 19:58, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
    • Changed. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:21, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
Fett
  • You said the group was named after Boba Fett and assassin droids in the intro, but it isn't mentioned in the history section. JangFett (Talk) 01:59, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
    • But it is mentioned in the Organization section, because OS doesn't specify a chronological moment to pinpoint it. Not changed - unless you insist. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:31, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
      • It is more appropriate if you mention it eariler, however. The article's history section would be a better place for it than in the organization section. JangFett (Talk) 03:42, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
        • Done. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:26, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 23:54, June 7, 2010 (UTC)