Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Battle of the TIE Fighter Construction Facility (second nomination)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Battle of the TIE Fighter Construction Facility

Nominated by: SuperFlash101
Nomination comments: All previous issues from last nomination appear to be fixed. No tags and clear sources.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Mauser
- I suppose you've checked the novel and the comic for any unique content?
  - That I'll have to dig up on.
- Intro should be expanded.
  - I'll expand the intro as far as I can.
- Context on why was Kota attacking Imperial targets.
  - I'll look up and add Kota's reasons behind the attack
- More context on Kota and Vader.
  - Same with Vader
- Context on Starkiller is only on the intro, should be in the body as well.
  - Where exactly do you want Starkiller added at?
    - First time he is mentined in the body of the article (not counting the intro section).
- Context on Juno and Rogue Shadow.
  - What type of addition on Juno and the ship and where?
    - Who/what were they and what were they doing there.
- Kota believed that Galen had a far greater calling, than just as Darth Vader's servant. Since you get to that part of the dialogue again later, I think it's safe to drop it.
  - Where's that line? I'll remove it.
- Expand the aftermath section. Especially the lightsaber part and Galen's lie to Vader.
  - ~~Will do.~~ Done
    - Do not strike other user's objections - it is always up to the reviewers themselves. Still no information about the fact that Galen lied to Vader about Kota's death.
- Anything else notable concerning game's demo? Like the RC-1138's helmet as an easter egg?
  - Don't know about that.
    - Check the demo for anything that differs from the final game.
- Source BTS.
  - Will do.
- That's all for now. Mauser^Comlink 16:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
  - Okay. —Excelsior, The Flash - ^{(Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay!)} 16:28, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
    - In the future: respond to objections after you've made respective fixes. Mauser^Comlink 16:36, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

By nominator's request, as he believes that the objections will take too long to address for the article to remain a GAN. CC7567 ^(talk) 20:23, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Grunny ^(Talk) 06:10, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Who am I to argue with that? Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:12, 26 May 2009 (UTC)