- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Battle of Sanrafsix (Galactic Civil War)
- Nominated by: 501st dogma(talk) 21:42, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: An Atlas/Warfare article that I decided to nom
(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)
Support
IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 22:19, October 4, 2012 (UTC)
Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 17:19, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
- Anyone else having trouble saying Sanrafsix? :P Commander Code-8 To say hi, press 42 04:30, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
Quite thrashing! Menkooroo (talk) 00:06, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 06:21, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
Object
Cav
Can we get some qualifying locations added? Sector, region, etc, to the infobox and article? Its fine saying that the battle was at a place, but give us context to the location. Same with the Eriadu Authority.- Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 10:46, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
Shea
The Imperial Remnant isn't around yet in 5.5 ABY --- any warlord fiefdoms are just that, and not under any central Imperial control.- Better?
With that said, there's probably somewhere that Galactic Empire can be linked, since Shea is called a "legendary Imperial starfighter pilot."- Fixed.
"which occupied a large area..." area of what?- There. Done.
A little nitpicky, but saying that the Eriadu Authority "collapsed" indicates that it ceased to exist, when it actually limped along until the Imperial Reunification. Can you use a less definitive word?Menkooroo (talk) 15:24, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
Toprawa
The intro links to the general parent page for X-wing starfighters. Would it not be more accurate to link to T-65 X-wing starfighter? Same for the body of the article.- Added.
Do we have a rank for Hublin at this battle that could be mentioned?- None.
- Not objections, but some notes on some of my changes: I rewrote some of the intro, primarily the first sentence, in an effort to put mention of the Galactic Civil War right at the onset, instead of leaving it for the second sentence. I also added a bit of context for the Sullust battle to help it tie in to this battle a little better. Please be sure to look it over and see if everything works for you.
- That works for me.
- In the Prelude, I replaced the verb "mauled" to describe the Imperial defeat at Sullust, because it just didn't sound right. The Atlas describes Delvardus as being "roundly defeated," and Warfare as "badly defeated," so I tried to stay true to the source's wording. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:47, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Warfare actualy uses mauled too in Hublin's entery. I've reverted it to mauled, as it sounds cooler. :) Thanks for looking it over. 501st dogma(talk) 20:37, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
- As long as the original sources uses that terminology, I'm fine with it. But the emphasis shouldn't necessarily be on what sounds cooler, but what best accurately describes the subject. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 06:21, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Warfare actualy uses mauled too in Hublin's entery. I've reverted it to mauled, as it sounds cooler. :) Thanks for looking it over. 501st dogma(talk) 20:37, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 06:21, October 25, 2012 (UTC)