Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Barons Hed tavern

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Barons Hed tavern

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. 501st dogma(talk) 23:44, December 18, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:23, February 11, 2016 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 17:12, February 14, 2016 (UTC)
  4. Cwedin(talk) 05:31, February 17, 2016 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 17:53, April 8, 2016 (UTC)
  6. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:14, April 9, 2016 (UTC)

Object

501st
  • The part about it being built prior to 5 ABY should be in the history. 501st dogma(talk) 01:13, December 7, 2015 (UTC)
    • I figured that "It had been built by" meant the same as "prior to or during"? Reworded it a little then. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 07:36, December 7, 2015 (UTC)
      • I mean that time related things such as construction date should be in the history, not the description. Here you should move the date it was constructed by to the history, as that is the proper place. 501st dogma(talk) 23:10, December 13, 2015 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Recommendation: Move the article instead to "Barons Hed cantina." There's no rule requiring the use of "Unidentified" in conjectural page titles for non-character articles. Anytime we can avoid "Unidentified," the better. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:46, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
    • Actually, the strategy guide calls this place a tavern on page 153. "Barons Hed tavern" would be more appropriate. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:54, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
      • Okay, I didn't know that's how buildings were handled. However, may require a tutorial on moving these pages and the associated nomination pages without getting errors. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 07:26, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
        • Or maybe I got it. I don't currently have access to the guide at the moment, so I'll have to clarify this myself if you want me to as to whether or not it's mentioned as "the Barons Hed tavern" or "a Barons Hed tavern," as to whether or not this is the bar's name or just a general descriptor. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 07:35, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
          • Considering "Barons Hed tavern" is still conjectural, I would still word it as "A tavern existed in Barons Hed, etc." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:38, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
            • Yah, looking at the book I see what you mean, now. Thanks, and it should look better now. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 19:00, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
  • The article is effectively devoid of categories, not counting the automatic maintenance categories. Please add all necessary ones. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:56, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
    • Wow, I had not noticed that. Very sorry, I think only these two apply, based on other cantina/tavern articles? --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 07:35, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
  • If I recall from perusing through the strategy guide, it says that there was another structure or establishment on the floor above the tavern. I can't remember exactly, but you should check and add anything it says to the Description. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:44, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
    • I do not believe that the apartments are directly above it, but rather they are in another chunk of the building close behind it. The overall layout was a bit confusing, and as such I'll have to load up the game when I get back to that computer to see how it's built.--Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:14, January 28, 2016 (UTC)
      • Ok, since you made an edit to the article per this objection, I want to clarify if you're finished or not. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:00, January 28, 2016 (UTC)
        • No. I want to look in-game, first. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 01:32, January 30, 2016 (UTC)
          • So, I believe that should do it as far as text goes. However, I'm going to change the image from the current one (Taken from under an archway) to a screenshot taken from across the lagoon, which shows more of the building and the whole complex. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 20:01, February 4, 2016 (UTC)
            • Ok, I'll wait to see which image you use. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:20, February 4, 2016 (UTC)
              • Well, there we go. I also had this one, which shows the entire building complex, but I figured it'd be better to focus on the tavern itself. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 21:34, February 11, 2016 (UTC)
                • If you wanted, you might be able to squeeze that other unused image into the Description section. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 23:23, February 11, 2016 (UTC)
                  • I attempted, using the other image for an idea. It's a bit of a pet peeve of mine to see headers and quotes shoved over in favor of an image (With some case exceptions). Otherwise, the image would have had to been dismally small. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 02:26, February 14, 2016 (UTC)
Ayrehead02
  • Are the two Gran always already dead when you enter or is it possible to kill all five yourself? The BTS makes it sound like you can kill all five, in which case the two dying should be moved into the gamemechanics bracket as the player can choose a different outcome. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:15, April 4, 2016 (UTC)
    • I suppose so. I think I left it out under the idea that the guide's suggestions could be taken as the canon path, as it's a written source. However, as it is up to the player, maybe it should go into the game mechanics. So consider it moved! --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 17:32, April 8, 2016 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:59, April 16, 2016 (UTC)