Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Aztubek

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Aztubek

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:54, July 4, 2016 (UTC)
  2. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 02:06, July 5, 2016 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Nicely written. Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:26, July 5, 2016 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Exiled Jedi (talk) 22:47, July 5, 2016 (UTC)
  5. ACvote IFYLOFD (Talk) 23:52, July 7, 2016 (UTC)

Object

Jorrel
  • Is there a specific reason you chose to crop the current infobox image to its current state, rather than use File:Kumru.png?JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 06:36, July 4, 2016 (UTC)
    • Yes. When using these map images, I think it's important to show surrounding features, such as neighboring planets, etc. Since Javin is the sector capital, I feel like it's probably important to show the article subject's location in respect to it. In Aztubek's case, I didn't feel it was very necessary to show High Chunah, whereas I wanted to keep Javin in the Kumru image. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:17, July 4, 2016 (UTC)
    • Also, I should probably note that one of my main factors when making these images is to try and keep the article subject as close to the image center as possible, which is another reason why I elected to crop like I did. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:22, July 4, 2016 (UTC)
      • Ah, I get the centering. I only really asked because of the awkwardly cropped-out "Corellian Trade Spine" label, which I (when posting the objection) thought would be a decent detail to retain. However, looking at other Atlas-type images on other pages, name-cropping pops up all the time so it's not a huge issue. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 02:06, July 5, 2016 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • Could you include which worlds neighbour it on the Corellian Trade Spine in the description like you have for Kumru? Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:28, July 4, 2016 (UTC)
    • I can, but I really only did it in Kumru as filler because there wasn't any other information to add. Kumru really isn't important to the Aztubek article, and I had thought that Aztubek's relationship to Javin was spelled out well enough in the History. What do you think? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:30, July 4, 2016 (UTC)
      • I would say that them being next to each other on the lane is important enough to include in the article for both Javin and Kumru, especially since it was done on Kumru and therefore would make the articles more consistent. The History does make it fairly clear that Javin and Aztubek are next to each other, but that only makes it seem more odd that the information about its other neighbour isn't included. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:42, July 4, 2016 (UTC)
        • I don't intend to be difficult, but if consistency is the overriding concern, then we should rightfully apply this principle to every single planet article with discernible neighbors, which just seems impractical and, worse, unnecessary. Rather, the focus should be whether there is an illustrative need to mention such detail. To cite Mexeluine as an example, I noted its proximity to Gerrenthum but omitted the fact that it's a neighbor of Kirtarkin, which isn't really relevant at all. To reach a common ground with you here on Aztubek, I can certainly mention that it's a neighbor of Javin, which is specifically relevant, but there's really no purpose to mentioning Kumru other than just to mention it. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:49, July 4, 2016 (UTC)
          • You're not being difficult at all, it seemed like interesting information to me but since you clearly feel more strongly about the issue and there's no rules either way I'm happy to support as it is. Just wanted to make sure the point was considered before I supported, and it clearly has been. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:54, July 4, 2016 (UTC)

Comments