Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Aurora (Star Dreadnought)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Aurora (Star Dreadnought)

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Clone Commander Lee Talk 11:11, April 17, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Menkooroo 20:37, May 14, 2012 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 12:28, May 15, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Cumulonimbus Cloud 02:38, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
  5. ACvote—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 23:10, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Lee's charge
  • Please mention it's captain in the intro.
  • As we know one of them, you need to have a "Commanders and Crew" section.
  • Good work and check your articles for spelling errors. Clone Commander Lee Talk 10:31, April 16, 2012 (UTC)
Cav
  • The article should be at Aurora (Star Dreadnought) as per the original source.
  • during the Galactic Civil War, a conflict between the Galactic Empire and the Alliance to Restore the Republic. The Alliance was the NR by this point.
  • Context for Orinda and its position as the current Imperial capital is needed.
  • More information is available for the article: Surprise Squadron is not mentioned at all, and neither is Ral'Rai Muvunc and his financial wizardry.
  • Why is it catted to Super Star Destroyers? Surely a Star Dreadnought category would be more appropriate. - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 12:49, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
    • Fixed catt, though I'll have to create it as none exists currently. 501st DogmaRepublic emblem(Comlink) 20:41, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
  • The Aurora was destroyed shortly after the Fourth Battle of Kuat, in which the Alliance's New Republic forces seized the planet, when Imperial agents hidden undercover activated the Aurora's hyperdrive, sending it into Kuat's sun. This sentence is a run-on, and kind of choppy. Can you reword, break up or restructure?
    • Done.
  • First paragraph in history is unreffed.
    • Reffed.
  • A description section could probably be added. - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 23:54, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
    • Added, but it's quite small. 501st dogma(talk) 20:38, May 7, 2012 (UTC)
Dogs!
  • The opening sentence of the intro is pretty long and run-on. Any way it could be split up? Alternatively, it could be shortened; context on things like the Galactic Civil War aren't strictly necessary in the intro but are fine if you want to keep them in.
    • Split.
  • "the Alliance's New Republic forces..." But but but, the New Republic and the Alliance aren't the same thing.
    • Fixed.
  • In "History:" "Soon after the New Republic, the successor state of the Alliance after their victory at Endor in 4 ABY..." This is the first time the Alliance is mentioned in the article body. Since the New Republic is fighting the war now, is it really necessary to mention the Alliance at all?
    • Deleted.
  • Can we get some context on Luminous and Event Horizon? Just what kind of ships they are?
    • Contexted.
  • Since this is in Category:Capital ships, could the article body mention somewhere that it's a capital ship so that the info isn't categories-exclusive? Menkooroo 16:43, May 14, 2012 (UTC)
    • Done in Description. 501st dogma(talk) 20:15, May 14, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 23:10, May 21, 2012 (UTC)


  • You forgot to categorize the article. I added a category to it, but I suggest adding other pertinent categories to it and double-checking your other warships to make sure that they're categorized. Trak Nar Ramble on 06:39, April 19, 2012 (UTC)
  • Fixed the title template for you. <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 20:24, April 24, 2012 (UTC)