Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Attack on Imperial interrogator droids

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Attack on Imperial interrogator droids

• Nominated by: Brandon Rhea^(talk) 05:51, March 13, 2015 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: With significant contributions by ProfessorTofty. - Brandon Rhea^(talk) 05:51, March 13, 2015 (UTC)

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

1. Sir Cavalier of One^{(Squadron channel)} 23:38, March 23, 2015 (UTC)
2. Manoof (talk) 23:11, March 30, 2015 (UTC)
3. Eww. Canon. 501st dogma^(talk) 23:25, April 23, 2015 (UTC)
4. Winterz (talk) 23:39, April 23, 2015 (UTC)
5. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 15:26, April 30, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Cav

• Why is "Mandalorian" not linked in reference to Sabine? Mandalorian/Canon is a redlink, sure, but that's no reason to avoid linking. Unless the NuCanon Mandalorian is at a different name. - Sir Cavalier of One^{(Squadron channel)} 13:29, March 16, 2015 (UTC)
  • It was decided early in our documentation of the new canon not to have a page called Mandalorian/Canon (you can see that it's protected from being created). The reason is that, in canon, Mandalorian is much different than Legends. The word is simply a demonym in canon. There would be nothing unique about Mandalorian/Canon compared to Mandalore/Canon. - Brandon Rhea^(talk) 14:36, March 16, 2015 (UTC)

501st

• Context for the Ghost in the body, and maybe the intro.
• Mandalorian/Canon should probably be created, as right now there is only Mandalore/Canon, meaning that Mandalorian has to be pipelinked to that. Nevermind, just read Cav's objection. :P
• No where in the body or the intro does it say that the event took place near an Imperial center, which the infobox denotes.
  • Does the Imperial center deserve an article?
• The intro could use some info on how the attack was carried out.
• The infobox should say "3 other rebels", instead of "other rebels", as the Aftermath says that there were only 5. Additionally, the History needs to say that there were only 5 rebels; don't wait til the aftermath.
  • The source isn't clear how many rebels were involved in the op. The part in the aftermath, which I've clarified, is to contextualize the false Imperial claim that there were dozens of rebels, because the total number of Ghost crew members at the time was five. - Brandon Rhea^(talk) 04:06, April 4, 2015 (UTC)
    • Sounds good. However, the "25 to 50" part should have the numbers written out, as it is our policy to have numbers under a hundred written with letters. 501st dogma^(talk) 00:27, April 8, 2015 (UTC)
• The infobox could have "Prior to the Battle of Yavin" as a date. 501st dogma^(talk) 13:14, April 1, 2015 (UTC)
  • All objections handled unless otherwise noted. - Brandon Rhea^(talk) 04:06, April 4, 2015 (UTC)

Winterz

• Context for paint bomb. Winterz (talk) 03:29, April 19, 2015 (UTC)
  • Paint bomb is pretty self-explanatory, IMO. Do you have any suggestions that don't make the explanation sound redundant to the name itself? - Brandon Rhea^(talk) 23:27, April 23, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 15:26, April 30, 2015 (UTC)