Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Asterpuff

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Asterpuff
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support votes
      • 1.1.2 Objections
        • 1.1.2.1 Comet
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Asterpuff

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 17:49, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Currently in the process of restoring most of Mac's lapsed SAs to status. This one was a CA, got bumped over via update from Panther, which had been identified as missing info via Lew and I's indexing of Convergence. But in this case not really much cause for it to remain a former SA since there's nothing wrong with it, so restoring like the others.
  • Date Archived: 03:48, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 316 words (40 introduction, 222 body, 54 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 316 words (41 introduction, 221 body, 54 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:THRWP:NOVELS

(4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 19:39, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Fan26 (Talk) 02:21, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  3. ACvote CometSmudge (talk) 22:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 03:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comet
  • I think it being lichen should be mentioned in the description section
    • Added.—spookywillowwtalk 21:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Would being able to disrupt communications make the Eirami lichen notable for its own page? CometSmudge (talk) 18:28, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
    • I did actually ask someone about that pre-nom, but IMHO we don't know a ton about it, the lack of proper ID, and that it could just be generic or the same thing since we never got an answer on that.—spookywillowwtalk 21:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 03:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)