Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Assault on Kile II

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Assault on Kile II

  • Nominated by: DjMack 02:47, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:I want to make every battle article relating to Star Wars: Rogue Squadron a good article... criticisms welcome

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Cav
  • First up: there are numerous redirects throughout the article. Please fix these and link to the correct articles accordingly.
  • Infobox: the infobox needs to be reloaded to the current template version and filled out.
  • Infobox: no image?
  • Infobox: under Imperial casualties - 65 what?
  • Intro: is "Assault on Kile II" the canonical name? If so, then "assault" needs to be capitalised in the intro. If not, a conjecture tag should be applied.
  • Intro: context on Kile II - planet, moon, asteroid?
  • Intro: Only two rebel pilots were gunned down. - can you reword using more formal language?
  • Intro: did the Imperial retreat? I saw no indication of that. Rogue Squadron withdrew after the assault. Also, what evidence is there that Antilles was put in tow to take him away?
  • The battle: However, the appears were enlightened to their presence at this point, - I have no idea what you mean here.
  • The battle@ who retreated soon after with him in haul. - again, evidence for Imperial retreat? - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 13:34, July 9, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

You'd need to see what you can find out whether the entangled timelines of Rogue Squadron and Dark Forces have any canon organization, so that the battle progressions are correct. DD97Which bear is best? 04:55, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

  • There's no real cohesive timeline for the two games, though they do take place concurrently. DjMack 00:20, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, you read that correctly. This article was nominated back in 2011, but it somehow didn't end up on the GAN page. It is being placed here now in good faith that the author will continue what he started out to do. If not, it will be archived as unsuccessful. Please continue any reviews on this article as usual.—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 03:38, July 9, 2012 (UTC)

  • Once the emailuser option works, we really should email DjMack. He hasn't edited since May 1. I opt to remove his nomination since I don't think he cares for it, but we'll see. JangFett (Talk) 14:58, July 9, 2012 (UTC)

Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

  1. ACvote Nominator hasn't edited since May 1st and the lack of properly nominating this article seems to be a general lack of interest. JangFett (Talk) 04:59, July 10, 2012 (UTC)
  2. ACvote --IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 05:10, July 10, 2012 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Ron Washington, you're never allowed to manage an All-Star team again. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:06, July 13, 2012 (UTC)