Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Anvil

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Anvil

  • Nominated by: Samonic Signatureicon (Talk) 15:17, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The flagship of my first GA, Crofyp's task force.
  • Date Archived: 21:57, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 852 words (167 introduction, 660 body, 25 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:CHISS WP:NOVELS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote Fan26 (Talk) 15:46, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
  2. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 23:03, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Commander Code-8 Hello There! 04:05, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
  4. NotBoop (talk) 17:19, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
  5. Lewisr (talk) 20:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Object

Fan
  • Missing publication year in BtS.
  • The wording of the third sentence makes it seem like it's describing the weapons complement of the Whetsone and not the Anvil.
  • Couple typos in the fourth sentence of that first paragraph :P Fan26 (Talk) 23:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
    • Jesus, what the hell is going on with my last few GANs, how do I not see this? Done, I hope… Samonic Signatureicon (Talk) 14:44, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
      • Nah don't worry man, we all make mistakes! Fan26 (Talk) 19:58, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
  • I think that description-section sentence should note that Thrawn felt the Anvil and Hammer were sister ships to the Whetstone; the quote indicates it was his merely opinion they were while the body seems to present it as if it were confirmed. Fan26 (Talk) 19:58, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
    • Done and moved to History, thought mentioning Thrawn in Description was weird. I think I trust Thrawn a bit too much. :P Samonic Signatureicon (Talk) 20:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
      • I'm still seeing it in the description section presented as fact, it looks like it is in the History section now too but if it is only Thrawn's opinion then the Description section should note that too. Fan26 (Talk) 23:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
        • Woops, thought I removed that. Samonic Signatureicon (Talk) 07:52, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
  • I think the first sentence of "Thrawn's Attack" could be broken up to improve readability. Fan26 (Talk) 01:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Is the second sentence of the intro really neccessarry? The only bit of it directly relevant enough to the Anvil to warrant inclusion in the intro is that the Anvil was part of Crofyp's task force. The rest of the sentence's info just looks like it would only need to be mentioned in the body. Fan26 (Talk) 01:21, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
    • I think it is. It may not be extremely relevant, but all my SAs related to Crofyp's task force mention both cruisers, so. Even the intro of Tildnis's page mentions the Anvil, so I'm not going to remove it. Samonic Signatureicon (Talk) 08:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
      • Fair, yeah Fan26 (Talk) 17:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
  • " the Springhawk reduced those weapons to scrap" I think this bit should sound a little more encyclopedic Fan26 (Talk) 06:40, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
    • Eh. I wanted to use that. :P Changed. Samonic Signatureicon (Talk) 09:00, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Comments

  • No image for History's first subsection. I considered adding a picture of hyperspace but decided against it.Samonic Signatureicon (Talk) 15:17, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:56, 4 June 2023 (UTC)