- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Ambush on Tatooine (Darth Maul)
- Nominated by: LelalMekha 12:14, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:This one hasn't been review by anyone, so I guess there will be many objections, but... that's how it works.
(3 ACs/4 Users/7 Total)
Support
- Looked for more objections when I was free, couldn't find any. Good Work! 501st dogma(talk) 18:45, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Darth Maul running away… Hope TCW never gets wind of this story, they might decide to make Maul like they made Grievous.—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 19:53, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Plagueis327 (talk) 02:03, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 09:04, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Exiled Jedi
(Greetings) 13:40, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
CC7567 (talk) 21:47, July 29, 2012 (UTC)
—Cal Jedi(Personal Comm Channel) 20:00, August 7, 2012 (UTC)
Object
501st
As this the title is conjecture, you should not start the article out as it is currently. Instead, something like this (but better); "During the Naboo Crisis in 32 BBY, Darth Maul was ambushed by the Sand People." You will have to reword some of the first bit to make this possible.- Reworded. Not sure if it fits you're requirements, so feel free to comment further!--LelalMekha 16:59, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
Context for Coruscant in Prelude.- Fixed. --LelalMekha 16:59, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
In the Prelude you say the ship was headed for Tatooine. It should be changed to say on the planet Tatooin, as that was from where the trace was sent.- Fixed. --LelalMekha 16:59, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
Context for Mos Espa maybe.- Done. --LelalMekha 16:59, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
- That's it for now as I am pressed for time. Good work. 501st dogma(talk) 16:28, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
Objections, objections…
In the Prelude, you need to give the proper source for Maul's status as a Dathomirian, something from TCW or the new book by Windham. I'm looking at this line specifically: …a Dathomirian Zabrak known as Darth Maul…—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 06:28, June 20, 2012 (UTC)- Fixed. --LelalMekha 07:02, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
Could you fix the reference by the word "Zabrak?"—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 19:38, June 20, 2012 (UTC)- Oh, dear! Hadn't seen this. Fixed. --LelalMekha 19:42, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good.—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 19:45, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, dear! Hadn't seen this. Fixed. --LelalMekha 19:42, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. --LelalMekha 07:02, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
Exiled Jedi
Didn't the Trade Federation occupy the entire planet of Naboo or at least most of it? The way you word the article, it sounds like the Trade Federation just invaded Theed.- It seems that only Theed and its vicinity were occupied, if I understand correctly the "Invasion of Naboo" article. --LelalMekha (talk) 18:32, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
Why would the treaty need to be forged if they forced the queen to sign it?- Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 18:32, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
In the result section of the infobox I believe you should mention Darth Maul's retreat.--Exiled Jedi(Greetings) 00:33, July 15, 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed too. --LelalMekha (talk) 18:32, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
Cav
Firstly, the date. You ref the date in the infobox to Star Wars Episode I Journal: Darth Maul and Star Wars: The Wrath of Darth Maul. However, in the bio, you ref the year to the NEC. So, which is correct? I'm guessing the NEC date since I don't believe either of the other two books would mention 32 BBY directly.- You are correct, NEC definitely is the source. The dating in the infobox is obviously a mistake dating back to the early stages of my writing. Done. --LelalMekha (talk) 18:32, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
Regarding the infobox; why is everything double reffed? Only one reference per item is needed, really.- Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 18:32, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
Intro: The year of the Naboo Crisis, Darth Maul was ambushed - I would just out and out state the year here.- There you are. --LelalMekha (talk) 18:32, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
A little context is needed - why were the TF blockading Naboo?- I added this sentence: "The invasion was part of a grand plot hatched by Sidious, a part of his scheme to establish himself as Chancellor of the Galactic Republic, beneath his public persona of Senator Palpatine." Is it good enough? --LelalMekha (talk) 18:32, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
While he thought that he could have easily defeated five of them with ease - repetition of easily/ease is redundant. Please remove one and/or reword.- Done. --LelalMekha (talk) 18:32, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
Context needed - what was the outcome of the duel between Maul and Jinn?- Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 18:09, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
- There it is. Let me know if you think it's sufficient. --LelalMekha (talk) 18:32, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 20:00, August 7, 2012 (UTC)