- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Althiri
- Nominated by: Eyrezer 13:09, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Guinea pigs for the Mandalorian Neo-Crusaders
(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
Support
- Looks good. (: --Tm_T (Talk) 13:25, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
-- 1358 (Talk) 13:29, September 5, 2010 (UTC)- Clone Commander Lee Talk 16:26, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Great work.—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 16:52, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Cylka-talk- 16:22, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Grunny (talk) 02:36, September 13, 2010 (UTC)
Object
Xd1358
You use 'assaulted' quite a lot in the body. Please vary your word choice.-- 1358 (Talk) 13:23, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
One
In the final paragraph of the body, it says that the Republic defeated the Sith Empire in 3,951 BBY. This is not the case, rather, Revan and Malak's Sith Empire was defeated in 3,956 BBY, and the Sith in 3,951 were under the command of Darths Sion and Nihilus, according to the Knights of the Old Republiv Campaign Guide.—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 16:55, September 5, 2010 (UTC)- I have referenced that line to the Atlas, which says, "The death of Malak left the Sith Empire leaderless, with a triumvirate arising to restore order ... The return of the mysterious Jedi Exile at Peragus brought about the triumvirate's downfall in 3951 BBY. ... The surviving Sith went underground, and the Republic began the messy work of reintegrating its lost territory." (p. 131). Therefore, it seems accurate to say the Sith Empire was defeated in 3951 BBY. I am not saying Malak was defeated in 3951 BBY. --Eyrezer 20:52, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Eh, I'm not too comfortable with this. I realize this is what the Atlas says, but Traya's triumvirate was still not the Empire of the Jedi Civil War.—Jedi Kasra (comlink) 01:21, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
- I have referenced that line to the Atlas, which says, "The death of Malak left the Sith Empire leaderless, with a triumvirate arising to restore order ... The return of the mysterious Jedi Exile at Peragus brought about the triumvirate's downfall in 3951 BBY. ... The surviving Sith went underground, and the Republic began the messy work of reintegrating its lost territory." (p. 131). Therefore, it seems accurate to say the Sith Empire was defeated in 3951 BBY. I am not saying Malak was defeated in 3951 BBY. --Eyrezer 20:52, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
Cylka
They manufactured their own starships as well as producing weapons of mass destruction. & The surviving starship scattered, with some attempting to cut across the plane of the rings in order to escape. These Althiri were shredded by the ring's asteroids, while others were slaughtered by Mandalorians. - You have these sourced to the KotOR game, but I can't remember them being explained there. I also can't find them in the dialog files. I may be wrong, but please double check this.Cylka-talk- 03:59, September 6, 2010 (UTC)- 2343: "They weren't stupid. Stupid races don't make starships and weapons of mass destruction. But they weren't masters of the arts of war as Mandalorians are."
- 2349: "It was most amusing to watch the surviving ships scatter and flee. Several even tried to dive through the plane of the rings to escape us!"
- 2350: "They were shredded by the rings, or crashed into rocks, or were destroyed by our forces as we pursued them." --Eyrezer 05:28, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 02:36, September 13, 2010 (UTC)