Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Almudin

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Almudin
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Cwedin
        • 1.1.2.2 Toprawa
        • 1.1.2.3 Zed
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Almudin

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:48, December 4, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Since I'm not sure there's precedent for deleted scenes being recanonized I'm happy to discuss it here. Also worth noting that I went with the deleted scene audio as the novel audio actually differs from the book itself, which is just confusing.

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Nice work! - Cwedin(talk) 22:07, December 8, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Now that you've addressed Cwedin's objections, it looks good to me. --Lelal Mekha The Uprising crest (Audience Room) 10:51, December 10, 2019 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Objections handled via IRC. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 04:09, January 13, 2020 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:20, January 14, 2020 (UTC)
  5. I know more than 2 non-AC votes are unnecessary, but I had an objection. Zed42 (talk) 19:26, January 14, 2020 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Good work Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 19:35, January 14, 2020 (UTC)

Object

Cwedin
  • Could you upload a new version of the BTS comic panel to include the captions?
    • Good point, I originally uploaded it for use in the body but now it's illustrating dialogue this makes much more sense. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:29, December 8, 2019 (UTC)
  • How different is the audiobook dialogue? In the case of Malakili#Finding purpose, a minor difference was worked out by adding brackets. - Cwedin(talk) 21:04, December 8, 2019 (UTC)
    • To be honest the deleted scenes dialogue is also a lot better than audiobook dialogue. The audiobook gives Almudin the voice of a very old man which sounds very strange next to images of Ramon Tikaram. I feel that if we're using the images from the deleted scene the audio is equally valid. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:29, December 8, 2019 (UTC)
      • Fair enough.
  • One last thing: could you add an imagecat? - Cwedin(talk) 21:32, December 8, 2019 (UTC)
    • Done! Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:37, December 8, 2019 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Same with your other nomination, I'd say his hair is "Brown (graying)"
    • Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:22, January 13, 2020 (UTC)
  • Can we get a different version of the Bio image where his eyes aren't closed? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 04:35, January 8, 2020 (UTC)
    • Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:22, January 13, 2020 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure I necessarily agree with the claim that "Almudin spoke to the cadet with a tone of less than disgust." Does the source actually state this? Because I'd say he sounds quite disgusted with every part of Han Solo.
    • Weirdly "with that tone of less than disgust" is the exact wording in the novel, otherwise I wouldn't have used such a strange phrase. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:58, January 14, 2020 (UTC)
  • Correct me if I'm wrong, but you're basically disregarding any dialogue from the comic adaptation that doesn't match the novel/audiobook, such as Almudin's line about lives being worth less than Imperial property (which I think would have been a good P/T detail to include otherwise). In which case I think you need note this treatment of the comic toward the end of the BTS.
    • I've added a sentence, is that enough? Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:58, January 14, 2020 (UTC)
  • We rejected, once upon a time, a proposal to utilize the "First pictured" template as the article is currently doing with regard to the comic. That template should just be removed. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:36, January 14, 2020 (UTC)
    • Good to know. Removed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:58, January 14, 2020 (UTC)
Zed
  • I think the skirmish with raiders is notable enough for its own page, since the novelization covers it with some detail. Zed42 (talk) 20:54, January 10, 2020 (UTC)
    • Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:40, January 13, 2020 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 19:35, January 14, 2020 (UTC)