- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.
Akanah Norand Goss Pell (+2)
- --Eyrezer 08:27, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I fixed many of the grammar problems. --Xwing328(Talk) 05:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- Neat! .... 07:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Objections
Grammar Issues .... 07:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)- Could stand a little expansion. Heck, it doesn't even mention the fact that she was intimate with Luke. Havac 05:35, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmm.. that was in there at one point. Looking back, it looks like an anon removed the reference. I agree that it could use some expansion. However, it doesn't really need to be expanded to be a good article does it? Cull Tremayne 17:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- If we have stuff that we know is missing, I believe it should be added first. Completeness of information is partially the mark of a good article. --Xwing328(Talk) 20:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- I agree with you. What I meant was that it could be expanded in the sense that more details of their travels through the books could easily be added. That would definitely be needed it it were ever to become an FA. However, I think it does cover the requirement, "broad in its coverage".
- Needs a longer intro. Needs some redlinks fixed. Atarumaster88 (Audience Chamber) 14:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- I agree with you. What I meant was that it could be expanded in the sense that more details of their travels through the books could easily be added. That would definitely be needed it it were ever to become an FA. However, I think it does cover the requirement, "broad in its coverage".
- If we have stuff that we know is missing, I believe it should be added first. Completeness of information is partially the mark of a good article. --Xwing328(Talk) 20:11, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- The quote needs a source. --Xwing328(Talk) 05:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC)