Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Ab'Bshingh

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Ab'Bshingh

  • Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 16:07, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: From CAN, again.

(4 ACs/4 Users/8 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 17:45, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Short and clean. Menkooroo (talk) 04:24, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
  3. There should be a victim support group for people who have trouble writing CAs. :P Commander Code-8 To say hi, press 42 04:59, November 8, 2012 (UTC)
  4. ACvote—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 15:38, November 27, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 16:23, December 13, 2012 (UTC)
  6. DarthRevan1173 Revan Headshot (Long live Lord Revan) 21:56, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
  7. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 21:59, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
  8. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:44, December 21, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Cav
  • controlled by the Imperial Remnant under Grand Admiral Thrawn during the Imperial Civil War. - Thrawn was dead before the Imperial Civil War, so you will need to check your facts and sources on this statement. Also, when did the Empire become known as the Remnant? Depending on the timeline, it may be that you have to refer to the Galactic Empire instead. - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 13:51, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
    • Actually Thrawn died near the end of the Imperial Civil War, and he controlled several Imperial factions, remnants to the Empire. It's not the Imperial Remnant though, corrected! Winterz (talk) 13:36, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
      • I was thinking of the Imperial Mutiny, apologies. Also, remember to check the infobox if information like affiliations are being corrected; you still had Imperial Remnant listed. I've changed it to reflect the change you enacted in the article itself. - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 17:45, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
Oooooh
  • Can you chronologize the "History" section? Its first discovery should be mentioned before the stuff about an Imperial visiting the planet a thousand years later.
    • I always did favor a sources order, less troubling to my english grammar! :p Anyway, fixed.
  • Our articles on Farang and Waroot both indicate that they fought each other for "centuries;" could this be indicated here? Menkooroo (talk) 09:50, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
    • Corrected. Winterz (talk) 13:43, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
Naru

Having looked at the map for Darth Krayt's Empire, this planet's system definitely isn't on it. You cannot say the planet was loyal to somebody unless it was explicitly marked on the map. It was within territory that was under the sway of the Federation's remnant,not necessarily loyal to it. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 21:52, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

  • It is within DK's Galactic Empire's space. About the other, yes you are right and I've corrected that sentence, though technically I just said that it had influence in that area, not in the planet itself. Winterz (talk) 00:38, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
    • As a follow up, I'm not sure "featured" is the right word for its mention in the Atlas, used in the BTS. I can't text search the book at the moment, but it doesn't seem like there was more than the listing in the appendix that canonized its grid location. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 02:29, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Since this appears to be the same situation regarding the Atlas was with Aaghra, I would recommend making any likewise changes to this article as well. Additionally, the BTS claims that this planet was mentioned in the Atlas, but the Atlas is not listed in the Sources list. I'm guessing the BTS needs to be revised. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:40, December 16, 2012 (UTC)
    • Done. I also took the liberty to modify the Atlas ref, regarding your latest objection in Aaghra. Winterz (talk) 21:50, December 16, 2012 (UTC)
  • I can tell just from reading this that this clause is extrapolation. Just because there is no canon information on Ab'Bhshingh's involvement in the galactic community doesn't mean it wasn't involved. It could have played a major role in some way, for all we know. This portion should be removed: "The world was not involved in the greater galactic activities"
  • It would not be inappropriate, per the Layout Guide, to include an "Inhabitants" section for the planet's two native species. I leave this up to your discretion. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:06, December 18, 2012 (UTC)
    • Both objections addressed. Winterz (talk) 17:18, December 21, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:44, December 21, 2012 (UTC)


501
  1. Winterz, pleae note that you cannot simply take a CAn from one page and place it on the GAN page. It needs to be archived first. I suggest you do do right away. Here are instruction on how to do so. 501st dogma(talk) 16:40, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
    • You mean the milestones? Well last time I did it, I received no warnings so I thought it was correct do proceed like that. Don't worry, next time I'll go through the procedures and await for it to be archived first. Winterz (talk) 16:44, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
      • Sorry. I thought you deleted the nom from the CAN Page. In the future, however, it would be better if you waited, just to avoid the confusion of having it on two seperate status article pages. 501st dogma(talk) 16:50, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
  2. I didn't want to place an object, but per the layout guide there should be a description section. Since there isn't a huge amount of info that could be put in, I'm not sure if you really do need a short one or can skip it. Commander Code-8 To say hi, press 42 01:34, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
    • Addressed nonetheless. Winterz (talk) 00:10, November 8, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Hope you don't mind me asking but isn't this article approved already? Oops. Winterz (talk) 01:11, December 1, 2012 (UTC)