Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/30th Anniversary Bash

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

30th Anniversary Bash

• Nominated by: OLIOSTER ^(talk) 00:40, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: A painting GA?! On the Wook?! It's more likely than you think.

(3 ACs/5 Users/8 Total)

Support

1. 501st dogma^(talk) 23:29, May 7, 2012 (UTC)
2. NaruHina ^Talk 02:09, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
3. —Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 01:10, May 22, 2012 (UTC)
4. Plagueis327 01:12, May 22, 2012 (UTC)
5. ~Savage 17:27, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
6. Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 01:23, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
7. CC7567 ^(talk) 22:25, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
8. IFYLOFD ^{(Floyd's crib)} 23:55, June 11, 2012 (UTC)

Object

501st

• Only one thing: context for galactic civil war in intro.
  • Better? OLIOSTER ^(talk) 23:21, May 7, 2012 (UTC)
• Good work. 501st dogma^(talk) 20:43, May 7, 2012 (UTC)

Savaged…

• Watch your tense; in the lead, it bounces back and forth between present and past.
  • Fixed. OLIOSTER ^(talk) 00:01, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
• Can you reword in the "Description" to make it clear that Salacious Crumb is not one of Jabba's guards? And isn't that Lando?
  • Hopefully better. I can't tell if its Lando or not, the picture used for the painting isn't very clear. OLIOSTER ^(talk) 00:01, May 13, 2012 (UTC)
• I'm a bit wary of the lead on this one. The lead gives pretty much all information from the "Description" and the "History," so why have a lead at all? I'd pare it down or remove it as redundant. ~Savage 19:25, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
  • Cut a bit of it, better? OLIOSTER ^(talk)
    • Sorry for the late reply! I'm still uneasy with the lead. There is no non-BTS info in the main article that is not also in the lead. Can you cut it down to the bare essentials? I'm not sure you need to go into such detail about the Galactic Civil War in the lead, for one. ~Savage 16:06, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
      • Hows that? OLIOSTER ^(talk) 17:09, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

I do believe this fall under WP:ENT. :P MasterFred^(Whatever) 13:29, May 2, 2012 (UTC)

• That it does. You're welcome to add a talk template or whatever. OLIOSTER ^(talk) 13:33, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
• Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 23:55, June 11, 2012 (UTC)