Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/19,000 BBY

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

19,000 BBY

• Nominated by: — Fiolli ^{{Alpheridies University ComNet}} 02:00, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Insert pithy comment here.

(4 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

1. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:20, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
2. SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is the truth)} 08:34, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
3. Great work! JangFett ^(Talk) 23:33, November 11, 2009 (UTC)
4. Jonjedigrandmaster ^{(Jedi Beacon)} 22:29, November 13, 2009 (UTC)
5. CC7567 ^(talk) 20:48, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
6. Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:00, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
7. IFYLOFD ^{(You will pay the price for your lack of vision!)} 05:41, November 26, 2009 (UTC)

Object

1. • "Outside the galactic disc, on Kamino, the isolated world underwent a dramatic climate change." Reword this. gives the impression that the isolated world and Kamino are separate entities. That's all, good work. IFYLOFD ^{(You will pay the price for your lack of vision!)} 00:02, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
     • Tweaked. Thanks, Floyd. — Fiolli ^{{Alpheridies University ComNet}} 03:24, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
2. Farlstendoiro and the Old Times
   • Intro: "East" is in inverted commas; I understand why. Could you reword the sentence to avoid unsual usage ?
     • Ok, I do not see the violation considering the colloquial nature of it from an in-universe perspective, but I'll relent. — Fiolli ^{{Alpheridies University ComNet}} 03:24, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
   • The galaxy in: This paragraph has two distinct parts: about Kamino and about elsewhere. Could you divide the section in two paragraphs? Also, Impact.
     • I do understand why you ask this and thought long about this. Why it was left alone: This was done to prevent short paragraphs that would not meet proper English writing conventions. The Impact section would have a violating paragraph due to number of sentences. To keep the parallel construction—as well as the fact that the second paragraph of The galaxy... would also be in violation due to sentence structure—it is best to leave them together as one. — Fiolli ^{{Alpheridies University ComNet}} 03:24, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
   • Footnotes: Could you replace "Simple math" with some other expression?
     • This was used as provided in WP:NOR and has been used for all the other dates that have been made into GAs to qualify that simple (or basic) math was used to derive the information rather than original research. I am just complying with the guidelines. — Fiolli ^{{Alpheridies University ComNet}} 03:24, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
   • Good work. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:25, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
     • Thank you, Skippy.
3. Bts, maybe? CC7567 ^(talk) 21:22, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
   • *facepalm* … Sorry about that, CC. Not sure what I was thinking. It's added now. — Fiolli ^{{Alpheridies University ComNet}} 14:10, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
4. Toprawa:
   • Same objection as the other date nomination I reviews. Please fix this link, and if any of your other date GAs have this issue, I would request that you please clean those up as well: "Simple math was used based upon the dating schemes in The Old Republic timelines." Toprawa and Ralltiir 04:39, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
     • Done and done. Thanks, Toprawa. — Fiolli ^{{Alpheridies University ComNet}} 04:56, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
       • Thank you, and good work. Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:00, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
         • Thanks, Toprawa. Although, I see that Floyd's objection is unstruck. Just so you are aware. — Fiolli ^{{Alpheridies University ComNet}} 05:02, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
           • Oops, yeah, I see that now. Just notified him in IRC. Hopefully we can get this thing out of here soon. :) Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:11, November 26, 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 06:09, November 26, 2009 (UTC)