Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/0 ABY

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

0 ABY

(-6)

Support

  1. Different, but good. Jediknight19bby (Jedi High Council Chambers!) 19:11, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. It's a list. StarNeptuneTalk to me! 20:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  2. Rule 1. It can't possibly be well written as it is a list AckbarSig TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar (It's A Trap!) 21:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  3. Normally I'm a proponent of thinking outside the box. But you can't just ignore the fact that the box exists. Gonk (Gonk!) 18:41, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  4. Per all of the above. Greyman(Paratus) 02:53, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  5. Per Greyman. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 11:23, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  6. Per everyone. Unit 8311 18:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  7. Per the world. Jediknight19bby (Jedi High Council Chambers!) 22:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Comments

  • Good for a year. Jediknight19bby (Jedi High Council Chambers!) 19:11, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Technically speaking, this article fills all the requirements; therefore, I'm not voting against it. However, I won't vote for it, either...since this will set a terrible precedence if it passes. --School of Thrawn 101 05:14, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Rules 6a & 6b, (only contains one unsourced image) and Rule 1b. AckbarSig TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar (It's A Trap!) 11:53, 27 July 2007 (UTC)