Wookieepedia:Featured article reviews/Rex/Legends

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Featured article that failed review. Please do not modify it.

Rex/Legends

• Requested By: ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola}
• Date Requested: 01:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
• Date Archived: 01:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Object

• Shorten large sections and paragraphs (this will require new quotes)
• Image for "Early Clone Wars" section
• Implement {{CWMCite}}
• Eliminate duplicate references; paragraphs shouldn't have just two references at the end; split the references into what source supports what information
• Check that sources actually support the facts, ie ATOC is used to support the fact that Rex fought with the Republic in the Battle of Geonosis
• Context for Battle of Skye
• Looks like {{StarshipsVehiclesCite}} is being used incorrectly
• Star Wars: A Galactic Pop-Up Adventure's page lists Rex as appearing in the book, but that source is not mentioned on this article. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 01:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
• Several trading cards are missing from Sources; see here. Remember when adding the cards, check P&T/History to see if they contain new information. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 02:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
• The German The Clone Wars magazine has several issues with Rex at least on the cover, and issue 7 has an article "All about Commander Rex". ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 14:17, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
• Might as well bring up that Forum:CT:Ordering of non-canon appearances affects this article, so that should be done as well. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 15:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Handled the CT for non-canon bit. NBDani (they/them)^{Yeager's Repairs} 01:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Comments

• I'm sad to bring this one up, but it has to be done. These are just some preliminary objections; I have not gone through a full review of the article yet, but just wanted to get these ones out there. This article is very, very good, but as a massive FA promoted in 2016 that has never undergone review, it needs work because quality standards have risen since then. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 01:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
• Marked as on probation at one month unaddressed. Lewisr (talk) 01:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Vote to retain Featured status

Vote to strip Featured status

1. Two months unaddressed. And tbf, probably a lot more to be done than just the above, realistically.—spookywilloww^talk 00:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
2. AnilSerifoglu (talk) 00:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
3. Lewisr (talk) 00:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)