Wookieepedia:Featured article reviews/Executor/Legends (second review)

< Wookieepedia:Featured article reviews
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Featured article that failed review. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Executor/Legends
    • 1.1 Object
    • 1.2 Comments
    • 1.3 Vote to retain Featured status
    • 1.4 Vote to strip Featured status

Executor/Legends

  • Requested By: spookywilloww
  • Date Requested: 18:53, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Date Archived: 17:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Object

  • Update tagged since mid-July.—spookywillowwtalk 18:55, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Subsectioning: the first subsections have five, five and six paragraphs, section "Starkiller's base of operation" has seven; "Imperial officer's base of operations" has a whopping ten paragraphs. I will review the article in more depth later, but I'm sure subsectioning is a problem throughout. Darth Bane is a good example of how long the subsections should be. ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 00:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Comments

  • Extension requested via Discord. Holding off on tagging due to that, and due to that this's already been under review this year so it's already up to par besides the update.—spookywillowwtalk 04:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Lifting above hold; sent to probation due to tagged since mid-July.—spookywillowwtalk 20:05, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Vote to retain Featured status

Vote to strip Featured status

  1. Inqvote Full probation cycle complete; hasn't been fixed in a half-year.—spookywillowwtalk 17:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 17:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Patiently waiting for the FAN in 20 years' time :P OOM 224 (he/him) 17:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)