Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Zsinj

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Zsinj

  1. Becd22 01:06, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  2. Darth Benobi 8:52, 15 Feburary 2006 (UTC)
  3. —Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 23:33, 13 March 2006 (UTC) Now that the redlinks are all gone.
  4. SFH 00:40, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
  5. Hmm. It took me over a month to vote for my own article. (This just confirms my belief that I'm my own most demanding critic.) —Darth Culator (talk) 16:29, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  6. RMF 03:36, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
  7. TIEPilot051999 01:52, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  8. Breathesgelatin 21:26, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Objections

  1. You're being a little premature. Still too many redlinks and not long enough since it was posted. —Darth Culator (talk) 03:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  2. Not yet. No Behind the Scenes section and some other yet minor problems. --UVnet 06:16, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  3. Very coolness on the BTS section! But some of the section headers are still... well... "The game begins"? "Project Funeral bears fruit"?"Endgame"? I don't know... --UVnet 05:53, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
I keep saying that's my biggest concern with the article. Nobody has suggested any alternatives. —Darth Culator (talk) 19:33, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Article looks damn fine now! Although there is a picture in the article with no text. I'm thinking of replacing it with an image of a TIE raptor. --UVnet 19:57, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
I went ahead and put in some pictures of Zsinj-related items, and updated all the captions. —Darth Culator (talk) 22:21, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Now this is FA material! --UVnet 05:11, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Comments

  • I wrote it, and I wouldn't vote for it until the redlinks are filled. I've been nibbling away at them slowly, but I've been distracted by deploying the new ship template. Once the redlinks are filled, and there has been time for people to proofread it and edit it for style and POV, then maybe it will be featured material. I'm happy that so many people like it, though. —Darth Culator (talk) 03:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Redlinks are gone folks. Lets go. -- SFH 00:40, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Yep. Redlinks are gone. Plus, it's been in Peer Review for some time and I've fixed everything that I was really worried about. Except the section headers (though I changed a few already), and I don't think those are enough of a problem to stress about (but if someone can think of better ones that would be super). And I added a small BTS section about the character's development (and I wasn't joking about the Harry Mudd thing. http://media.ign.com/boardfaces/9.gif) —Darth Culator (talk) 16:29, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • It looks great. Breathesgelatin 21:28, 26 March 2006 (UTC)